Neighbors voice concerns over proposed annexation of 500 West property
by Rose Egelhoff
The Times-Independent
Aug 17, 2017 | 1285 views | 0 0 comments | 91 91 recommendations | email to a friend | print


On Thursday, Aug. 10, the Moab City Planning Commission considered the annexation of a 10-acre parcel from Grand County to the City of Moab. The property, located at 936 and 1001 North 500 West, is currently a rural residential zone in Grand County.

The owners have requested the property receive R-4 multifamily residential zoning for 7 acres and C-4 commercial zoning for 3 acres on its eastern side, near 500 West.

The commission was divided as to whether to recommend that the Moab City Council approve or reject the application and requested zoning. Planning commission chairwoman Laura Uhle and commissioner Joe Downard voted in favor of a positive recommendation and commissioners Jeanette Kopell and Wayne Hoskisson voted for a negative recommendation.

Commissioner Allison Brown recused herself from the vote, as she lives in the neighborhood adjacent to the property in question and signed a petition, along with other neighbors, protesting the request for C-4 commercial zoning and requesting R-3 or R-4 multifamily residential zoning instead. A dozen residents attended the unusually busy planning commission meeting.

The property lies to the north of an R-2 residential city zone and to the south of a city commercial zone. West of the property is a county resort commercial zone.

The annexation would eliminate a peninsula of county land that currently extends into the city. Rachel Stenta, the city recorder, certified that the annexation meets the necessary legal requirements as of July 31, said Moab City Planning Director Jeff Reinhart.

Uhle asked whether the city had any suggested zone for areas being annexed.

“That’s exactly what we need to have developed … a future land use map,” Reinhart said.

“This one is difficult because it is surrounded by residential,” Kopell said. “500 West is ... an artery to [highway] 191. Therefore it is set up to be a commercial byway. Whether we like it or not, it’s set up as a commercial byway. So I’m stuck between a rock and a hard place.”

“I’d rather take baby steps … do it slowly and make sure all of our I’s are dotted and our t’s are crossed before we go ahead and make this huge decision at this point.”

Hoskisson suggested recommending that the city work with a developer to find a zone other than R-4 multifamily residential.

“Legally I think it would be hard to say no [to C-4 commercial zoning],” he added.

Uhle agreed.

“The R-4 is debatable,” Uhle said. “I think it’s a great idea because you’re bringing in the possibility of employee housing and that kind of thing. So I think that’s great and I think it’s the right thing for the city but I don’t really have any problems with the C-4 either.”

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.