Governor Gary Herbert brings message of growth, unity to Moab
Discussion of rentals, tourism, transportation highlight joint city, county meeting
by Jacque Garcia
The Times-Independent
Oct 12, 2017 | 3017 views | 0 0 comments | 92 92 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gov. Herbert met in a roundtable format with members of the Moab City Council and Grand County Council.
										          Photo by Jacque Garcia
Gov. Herbert met in a roundtable format with members of the Moab City Council and Grand County Council. Photo by Jacque Garcia

Utah Governor Gary Herbert made it clear that he appreciates the beauty of Moab and the tourism industry its citizens cultivate — he opened Arches National Park during a government shutdown in 2013, and during the joint Grand County Council-Moab City Council meeting he attended in Moab last Wednesday, Oct. 4, he heard Moab’s representatives explain just what it takes to make their city thrive.

According to Utah’s Office of Tourism, visitors to the state brought in $1.15 billion in tax revenue in 2015, 15.2 percent of which came from Grand County alone. Despite this, city council members view several discrepancies between the city and state over laws that affect Moab citizens and their ability to coexist with tourism on a local level.

One such law, brought up by council members at the meeting, is proposed in House Bill 253, which would allow property owners greater freedom in advertising on short-term rental websites, such as AirBnB.

Council member Curtis Wells told the governor that the city’s complaints are not with short-term rentals, like AirBnB in general, but in their inability to control zoning in residential areas. Wells explained to the governor that the sharply increasing number of short-term rental properties is leading to a decreasing supply of affordable housing for Moab residents and seasonal workers.

Moab Area Travel Council Director Elaine Gizler reported that the transient room tax is another area in which the state control is exercised over Moab tourism. Gizler said that placing the duty of collecting this tax on the state has cost Moab over $158,000.

The governor listened to concerns of the council members, and made it clear that he came to Moab to understand the concerns of its citizens. As a self-proclaimed free market capitalist, he believes in “bottom up politics,” where local governments take local matters into their own hands and have the resources to do so. While he offered no immediate solutions, he voiced his support for the initiative of Moab’s local government, which could prove important in Utah legislation.

Governor Herbert also voiced his support of Moab’s interest in the $100 million UDOT fund for transportation projects. When the city council said their interest in using this funding to improve Moab’s ability to support the heavy traffic of its tourism industry, Herbert remarked, “I understand the need, now you need to engage.”

Another topic discussed at the meeting was the proposal for building a new campus for Utah State University-Extension in Moab.

The proposal is a non-controversial one, according to Dr. Lianna Etchburger, executive director of USU-Extension. Dr. Etchburger said that the community in Moab recognizes the opportunities the campus will provide in creating more high paying jobs for its residents, and more affordable education for its local students.

Because of this, the university has already had some success in fundraising for the project internally. Gov. Herbert said he was optimistic that, given the community support and internal fundraising, the state would offer its support to the project as well.

Prompted by members of the city council, the conversation then turned to public lands.

City council member Tawny Knuteson-Boyd told the governor that the citizens of Moab are very passionate about the public land surrounding their homes, and Wells supported her statement, saying, “Conservation deserves a seat at the table, but it needs a more collective approach.”

Despite his continued support in favor of placing federal lands under state control, Gov. Herbert stressed that Moab residents have nothing to worry about, calling energy development a “myth” and saying, “We are a public lands state. We will always be a public lands state.”

“We ought to be good stewards of our land,” Gov. Herbert said, “and manage them to their optimal benefit.”

In his closing remarks, the governor stressed the importance of respectful and civil discourse amidst political disagreement. “I’m so sick of politicians that are always right,” he said, indicating that he prefers effective politicians that are concerned with “nothing but the facts.”

The governor thanked the city council members for their input, and encouraged them to continue working with both their constituents and the state to provide Utah residents a “high quality of life.”

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.