Advice from Mayor Sakrison: Be careful what you wish for
As his final term ends, mayor weighs the cost of decades of transformation
by Rebecca Worby
High Country News
Nov 30, 2017 | 590 views | 0 0 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Mayor Dave Sakrison speaks at a press conference in February 2017 celebrating passage of Moab’s 100-percent Clean Energy Resolution and the installation of a new solar array at Moab City Hall. 	         Courtesy photo
Mayor Dave Sakrison speaks at a press conference in February 2017 celebrating passage of Moab’s 100-percent Clean Energy Resolution and the installation of a new solar array at Moab City Hall. Courtesy photo
slideshow


When Moab Mayor Dave Sakrison entered local politics in the mid-1980s, the uranium industry was in steep decline. Mining had been the town’s primary employer, but the local uranium mill had filed for bankruptcy, and people were leaving town. “It was a pretty economically depressed era,” Mayor Dave, as he’s known around town, said recently. Someone had posted signs at both ends of town: Last person out, turn out the lights. “You could’ve shot a cannon off down Main Street,” he said, “and you wouldn’t have hit too much.”

Sakrison, who had been selling mining supplies, got into the video business, back when people still rented videotapes. He later bought what became Dave’s Corner Market, where he can often be found, making coffee and talking with the locals.

After 16 years as mayor, Sakrison will be replaced in January by Emily Niehaus, the founder of affordable housing nonprofit Community Rebuilds. Over more than three decades, Sakrison has both witnessed and actively contributed to making Moab the place it has become: a much visited, heavily Instagrammed destination whose popularity continues to grow with dizzying speed. When he first ran for city council, tourism — as a means to boost Moab’s economy after the mining downturn — was a key part of his campaign. “We live between two national parks,” he reasoned, in a scenic red rock area unique in the entire world. “The obvious choice was, well, let’s try to promote tourism.”

It worked. “We’ve been very successful in bringing people to our community,” Sakrison said, his phrasing deliberately neutral and also a major understatement. In 1985, nearby Arches National Park saw fewer than 400,000 visitors. In 2016, that number topped 1.5 million. In total, it’s estimated that more than two million tourists now visit the town each year. A former director of the Moab Area Travel Council once described it as “Disneyland on dirt.”

Sakrison spoke candidly about the costs of Moab’s tourism success. Reliance on a service economy means mostly low-wage jobs. Affordable housing is a huge and growing problem. AirBnB dealt an unforeseeable blow, and slick condo developments are popping up for overnight rentals only. A lot of the new housing is, as Sakrison put it, “not affordable for the average person who wants to work in this community.”

On any given weekend, the influx of visitors easily doubles or triples the town’s population of about 5,000. That’s strained the town’s services, from water and sewer infrastructure to police and fire departments. Hordes of adventure-bound ATVs rumble along Main Street, making so much noise that the town launched a “throttle down in town” campaign last year.

But Moab is not just a tourist destination. “This is a community first and foremost,” Sakrison said. Quality of life for residents motivated projects like the Mill Creek Parkway, a recreational path wending through downtown, and the Moab Recreation and Aquatics Center, which opened in 2011. Moab has always been “a Main Street kind of community,” noted Sakrison, with commercial development hewing closely to U.S. Route 191, the only major artery. Not so anymore: Moab never tightened up its zoning, and now, in what Sakrison lamentingly called the “general commercialization of the community,” development has crept into neighborhoods. It’s slid down the highway strip far past downtown.

Since the days of Edward Abbey, Moab’s increasing tourist traffic has produced curmudgeons: people who fall in love with Moab at a moment in time, who uneasily watch the throngs roll in and wax bitter and elegiac about how it used to be. But Mayor Dave is a different specimen: He has always been less concerned about the place Moab was than the place it is becoming. These days, Sakrison is somewhat contrite about what’s happened to his town. “There are things I wish we would’ve done a heck of a lot differently than we did,” he said. Recalling the way that he and others in Moab actively promoted tourism after uranium went bust, he warned, “You [have to be] careful what you wish for.”

With Utah’s controversial Bears Ears National Monument garnering considerable attention, other southern Utah towns may look to Moab as an example — or a cautionary tale. The mayor of Blanding, a city with the motto “Base Camp to Adventure,” is a friend of Sakrison’s, and they often discuss that topic.

“I think I could write the book on becoming a tourist community,” Sakrison quipped. His advice comes down to planning, both in terms of zoning and simply thinking things through: “You’ve got to take a well-balanced approach to what you want to be,” he said. He feels Moab lost sight of that. “We haven’t done an adequate job of trying to expand or diversify the economy in any real substantial way,” he said.

When we spoke recently, Sakrison called back a few minutes after we’d hung up. “Let’s not forget the good things,” he said gently. He mentioned some of the benefits of tourism: the relative economic stability, the 60-year-old wastewater treatment plant finally getting redone along with other key infrastructure projects. “We’re replacing pipes now, we’re repaving streets,” he said. “We’re employing more people.” He’s also set his sights on a possible Utah State University satellite campus that’s been discussed for years, a project he will continue working on when he’s no longer mayor.

But Sakrison is most proud of the relationship Moab residents have with the land. “We’ve tried to do things that enhance or maintain the beautiful place we live in,” he told me. The county-sponsored Trail Mix committee works with land management agencies to develop and maintain trails for mountain bikers, hikers and equestrians. Sakrison mentioned efforts by local groups like the motorcyclist-led nonprofit Ride With Respect to educate people about staying on trails to protect fragile desert lands. “We’re very sensitive to the environment,” Sakrison said, “and we want our visitors to enjoy and respect it.”

Sakrison plans to remain engaged after his time as mayor ends, though he’s not yet sure how. He’s been advised, he told me with a laugh, to “learn how to say no.” But he cares deeply about Moab — and not in the way that visitors, who come craving red rock views or an adrenaline rush, do. “I love the people who live here,” he said, with clear sincerity. “I really want to see the best for this community.”

Rebecca Worby is an editorial fellow at High Country News. This story was originally published at High Country News (hcn.org) on Nov. 23.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.