Planning commission presents priorities
by Rose Egelhoff
The Times-Independent
Apr 05, 2018 | 726 views | 0 0 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Grand County Planning Commission hopes to create a small area plan for the areas to the north and south of town along U.S. Route 191 that fall within Grand County, including this stretch of highway north of town. 				     		                           Photo courtesy Google Earth
The Grand County Planning Commission hopes to create a small area plan for the areas to the north and south of town along U.S. Route 191 that fall within Grand County, including this stretch of highway north of town. Photo courtesy Google Earth
slideshow


The Grand County Planning Commission retreat this year was productive, resulting in a list of priorities for the coming year. The priorities included small area plans for the north and south corridors of U.S. Route 191 and continued work on the assured housing and high-density development overlay plans, according to Grand County Community and Economic Development Director Zacharia Levine during an April 3 presentation to the Grand County Council.

The commission also hopes to work through a revision of the land use code table, much like the City of Moab has been working on.

“One of our priority areas [is] removing conditional uses from that table and moving more in the direction of having permitted uses or non-permitted uses ... and for those that are currently conditional uses, trying to tighten up use standards. This is something that mirrors what is happening throughout the state and is recommended by the … [Utah Association of Counties], the Utah Land Use Institute and others,” Levine said.

Secondary priorities include increasing coordination between Grand County, the City of Moab and San Juan County, a goal the Grand County Council could play a lead role in, Levine suggested. The planning commission also hopes to meet on a semi-regular basis with the county council.

Another priority is creating a plan for parks, recreation and trails at the county level.

“As of a couple years ago, we removed the open space requirement from [planned urban developments] so right now there’s nothing in Grand County code that actually creates and preserves park space for our residents,” Levine said. “We know from decades of planning practice that public parks and recreational amenities are really important as a community grows and evolves and that’s what we’re seeing in the southern portion of the valley.”

A final goal the planning commission discussed was incorporating natural and built constraints on development into the planning review and approval process.

“Here the planning commission was primarily thinking about water but I think that they just want to have a better sense of what the limits to growth are,” Levine said.


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.