City PC rejects hotel’s request for larger signs
by Rudy Herndon
Staff Writer
Dec 19, 2013 | 1321 views | 0 0 comments | 60 60 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The owners of the Holiday Inn Express in Moab failed to convince the city planning commission to recommend a change to city zoning laws that would allow larger signs at the hotel. Times-Independent file photo
The owners of the Holiday Inn Express in Moab failed to convince the city planning commission to recommend a change to city zoning laws that would allow larger signs at the hotel. Times-Independent file photo
slideshow
Moab’s planning commissioners have a vision of what they want the city’s northern gateway to look like, and it doesn’t include larger signs within the resort commercial zone.

The commission is advising the Moab City Council to reject a change that would allow the Holiday Inn Express to install a bigger sign just off U.S. 191.

Hotel representatives asked the city to approve an ordinance that would revise sign height regulations inside the zone on the north end of town. But planning commissioners voted 3-0 on Dec. 12 against a proposed amendment that would allow signs in the zone to rise eight feet above the highway grade and span up to 110-square-feet in overall size.

Commission members Joe Downard and Laura Uhle did not attend the Dec. 12 Moab City Planning Commission meeting.

Planning commission member Wayne Hoskisson said he believes the changes run contrary to the city’s northern gateway plan, which aims to create a positive first impression of Moab and Grand County.

“It does counter, I think, what was envisioned for that corridor,” he said.

As an alternative, Hoskisson suggested the hotel should consider the possibility of installing other signage that would fit within the city’s existing code.

“If there is a remedy, this is not it,” Hoskisson said.

Current city zoning regulations limit new sign heights in the area to a maximum of 8 feet, and set limits for illuminated signs at a total of 24-square-feet.

Denise Dragoo, the attorney for Holiday Inn Express, said the proposed changes would improve the visibility of the hotel, which rests below the highway grade off a frontage road. As it is, the top of the hotel’s sign is 10 inches below the crest of the highway, according to Holiday Inn Express general manager Jeramy Day.

A more prominent sign would be a significant upgrade for the Holiday Inn Express and its guests, who often have trouble finding the hotel during daylight hours, Day said.

The problem, he said, is that people who are driving into town are taking in the valley’s beautiful sights instead of looking down in the direction of the current sign.

Visibility aside, Dragoo called the signage issue a matter of equity, or fairness.

She said that other businesses in the resort commercial zone, including the Aarchway Inn, have larger signs that were grandfathered in when the city annexed the area.

Day, meanwhile, assured the planning commission that the hotel is seeking only modest changes to its signage.

“It’s not something gaudy that we’re asking for,” Day said. “It’s not going to be Vegas at all.”

For his part, Moab City Planning Director Jeff Reinhart said that signage doesn’t appear to be a problem, noting that there are two very large signs on the hotel building itself.

Likewise, planning commission chairwoman Kelly Thornton said that changes to the building have made it more visible over time.

In addition, she echoed Hoskisson’s concerns about the impacts that the changes could have on the city’s gateway plan.

“This is way too drastic,” Thornton said. “A lot of thought went into [that plan].”

Moab resident Diane Walker told the planning commission that she believes the plan is worth protecting.

“To just change this for one business seems like a radical departure,” Walker said.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.