Discrimination and patronization...
Dec 20, 2012 | 1731 views | 0 0 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I cannot comprehend why the changing of Negro Bill Canyon to William Grandstaff Canyon has become such a tribulation. We live in a modern world with equal rights yet we still refer to one of our first settlers as “Negro” Bill. Just to make this clear, the white settlers gave that name to Mr. William Grandstaff.

Here is a man that accomplished more than most white men in the 1800s, yet the white settlers couldn’t see past his skin color? So they could only speak of him by calling him Negro Bill, degrading all his efforts to make a name for himself and become successful in the Moab area.

County council members and NAACP members claim the changing of Negro Bill Canyon to William Grandstaff Canyon cannot happen due to history purposes. What “history” are they speaking of? Are they speaking of the American Civil Rights movement when Malcolm X, objected to the word, preferring Black because he associated the word Negro with the long history of slavery, segregation, and discrimination that treated African Americans as second-class citizens, or worse. Are they speaking about the 1970s when the word “Negro” fell out of favor in the United States? Lets not embrace our settler’s discrimination and patronization.

Being in the hospitality industry, when I inform tourists about the great hike up Negro Bill Canyon, I don’t get the response of enthusiasm – it’s more on the lines of revulsion for Moab’s discrimination. Granted it might be past discrimination, but from my experiences most of them get the impression they are visiting a beautiful area full of racism. I often find myself apologizing on the behalf of the first white settlers.

As some of you may know, William Grandstaff was a rancher, a farmer, a prospector and a homesteader. He owned land as well as livestock. Keep in mind this was in the 1800’s! I would say he certainly established himself. Being of a different race during those times was not easy and he conquered a great deal. So why do we still refer to him as Negro Bill? Shouldn’t we stop defining people as belonging to a certain ethnicity, and get in sync with the modern world?

I believe there is a misconception going around that those who want to change the name will take away the disgrace that was once perpetuated and in a sense “forgetting” about it. This is not the case, his entire life story is important and should not be forgotten. The point is, wouldn’t you want to be remembered for WHO you were and not WHAT you were?

—Megan Coleman


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.