Fair-handed government...
Nov 01, 2012 | 802 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Jeramey McElhaney’s recent editorial (“Grand County’s current form of government is plagued with problems...”) is completely wrong on nearly every point.

There are three elements of Grand County’s plan for government that a new form of government can’t contain – term limits, recall elections, and non-partisan elections. Mr. McElhaney indicated that these elements “…are huge legal concerns…” and thus, we need to go through the process to change our form of government to address them. This is flat out not true.

The above three elements can be amended by the council at any time without changing the form of government. I believe these elements have reasonable legal standing. But, even if a judge found these elements to be illegitimate, there is little to no financial risk. The judge would just order that we do things differently.

Grand County’s form of government is clearly “grandfathered,” as state code only places limitations on the above three elements for plans adopted after May 2000. Also, the statute our government was founded under was left on the books for the express reason of maintaining our legal status. (State Code 17-52-402, 17-35b)

Term limits are not governed federally, but, rather by state. Utah’s Constitution doesn’t mention term limits, and so they are a grey area unless expressly defined by statute. State statute and case law do deny term limits for some offices, but council seats are not mentioned.

Regarding recall elections, the state constitution says that an elected official can only be removed from office by “law.” Some interpret this to mean only state law, and not local (county) law. This point has never been tested in the courts to my knowledge. (Utah Constitution, art. VI, sec. 21)

Non-partisan elections are only exempted from plans for government adopted after May 2000. (17-52-402)

Mr. McElhaney obviously doesn’t understand county government, as a “county administrator” is not possible under any form of government. The current limitations of executive authority will remain the same regardless of a change in government. Our current government gives the ability to confer all or part of that executive responsibility to the administrator. Hence, the flexibility I’ve been referring to.

But all this technical mumbo-jumbo is really beside the point. This is clearly a partisan attempt to rewrite the county’s form of government to the benefit of the Republican Party. You either support that notion or you don’t.

I support a government that gives a fair hand to all. I’m voting “No.”

—Chris Baird

Moab


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.