Groups seek to block oil shale, tar sands development
by Steve Kadel
staff writer
Jun 06, 2013 | 3054 views | 0 0 comments | 30 30 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Moab-based Living Rivers has joined other environmental groups in filing a notice of intent to sue the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for allegedly failing to protect endangered species on public lands offered for oil shale and tar sands development.

The 60-day notice was filed May 23 in federal court in Denver, said John Weisheit of Living Rivers. The notice is the first step toward filing a lawsuit.

The BLM has allocated more than 800,000 acres of public land in the Colorado River Basin for oil shale and tar sands development, according to a news release from Grand Canyon Trust, one of the groups that filed the notice of intent.

“This plan threatens to industrialize backcountry, pollute air and water, destroy habitat, and commit the Colorado River Basin to an even drier future,” Grand Canyon Trust’s Taylor McKinnon said in the release.

However, U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, said in a letter to the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) that litigation from environmental groups already has reduced the available BLM land for oil shale development in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming from 1.9 million acres to 679,000 acres.

Bishop said the BLM is also proposing “significant changes” to the oil shale commercial leasing program. Those changes include a policy of granting commercial leases for oil shale research and development only after the agency has determined the drilling operations can occur without “unacceptable environmental risk,” according to the BLM.

Bishop’s letter called that “a nebulous term.” He said it duplicates safeguards already in place under the National Environmental Policy Act.

The letter, also signed other senators and representatives, including Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, asked the DOI to extend the public comment period on the new regulations by 60 days from its May 28 closure. Bishop’s spokeswoman Melissa Subbotin said the request was granted.

The BLM’s proposed new policy also would replace the current royalty rates industry must pay, a change Bishop and others believe will deter energy development. The new rule would boost the present 5 percent rate adopted in 2008 under the Bush administration to 12.5 percent.

But Steve Bloch, attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, said the oil shale industry now pays les for development rights than does the traditional oil and gas industry.

“It’s almost like a taxpayer-funded incentive,” Bloch said.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.