Legislature passes pot bill
by Doug McMurdo
The Times-Independent
Dec 06, 2018 | 893 views | 0 0 comments | 45 45 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Medical cannabis is now legal in Utah after lawmakers hashed out a bill to replace the voter-approved Proposition 2 during a special session Monday, Dec. 3. 
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain
Medical cannabis is now legal in Utah after lawmakers hashed out a bill to replace the voter-approved Proposition 2 during a special session Monday, Dec. 3. Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

How medical marijuana will be distributed, how many dispensaries can be in operation and a limit on edibles were among the issues agreed upon Monday when members of the Utah House of Representatives and Senate approved a bill that would replace the voter-sanctioned Proposition 2 in the Nov. 6 election.

Monday’s special session lasted several hours and the vote was largely along partisan lines, with minority Democrats chastising their colleagues across the aisle for ignoring the will of voters.

Proposition 2 passed by a wide margin in Grand County, and by narrower votes elsewhere in Utah.

Gov. Gary Herbert signed the bill on Monday, and it went into effect at that time.

“This is a historic day,” said House Speaker Greg Hughes in a statement. “With the passage of the Utah Medical Cannabis Act, Utah now has the best-designed medical cannabis program in the country. Working with trained medical professionals, qualified patients in Utah will be able to receive quality-controlled cannabis products from a licensed pharmacist in medical dosage form. And this will be done in a way that prevents diversion of product into a black market.”

There are concerns medical marijuana will not be available in rural Utah as the bill cuts down the number of private medical marijuana offices compared to what was spelled out in Prop 2, which would have permitted 40. The new bill calls for seven cannabis “pharmacies.”

Utah Rep. Christine Watkins, Price, told the Salt Lake Tribune the reduction in dispensaries will disadvantage her constituents in rural eastern Utah since many people see nurse practitioners rather than physicians and there are few medical doctors on staff at small hospitals. Watkins told the newspaper she plans on submitting a substitute bill that would include physician assistants and nurse practitioners in the program.

Prop 2 also allowed patients to consume edibles while the bill approved Monday only allows gelatin cubes. Those who suffer with an autoimmune disease, with the exception of Chrohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, won’t be eligible for a marijuana prescription. They would have been under Prop 2.

People 21 and older only need to get a prescription from a doctor, but adults 18-20 must get permission to use cannabis from a so-called “compassionate use board” comprised of appointed physicians.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.