Losing freedoms...
Dec 06, 2012 | 448 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It certainly appears that Gov. Mitt Romney was greatly mistaken about his now infamous 47 percent statement that contributed to his election loss. It is not that he was mistaken about the statement itself, but about the numbers.

It was not 47 percent of the people but, as it turned out, it was 51 percent who want the federal government to govern every aspect of their lives. This shift towards socialism is a basic violation of the Law of the Harvest, or the law of justice. Under the something-for-nothing philosophy, the government will take from the “haves” and give to the “have-nots.” Both have lost their freedom.

Those who “have” lost their freedom to give voluntarily of their own free will and in the way they desire. Those who “have not” lost their freedom because they did not earn what they received. They got “something for nothing,” and they will neither appreciate the gift nor the giver of the gift.

Under this climate, people gradually become blind to what has happened and to the vital freedoms which they have lost.

—Dee Tranter

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.