My View
A radical change of use
by Kim Jacobs
Apr 19, 2018 | 576 views | 0 0 comments | 37 37 recommendations | email to a friend | print


Last fall a few of us out here in Spanish Valley witnessed a plane crash on the Old Airport. While it wasn’t a fatal crash, it highlighted what could happen on the nearby Sky Ranch airstrip if the developers get approval to line the old runway with houses. Since I live a couple of wingtips away from the airstrip, I decided to research the impacts small plane crashes have in neighborhood airports and the concept of “change of use.”

In the aviation world there is rule called “plus three minus eight.” This refers to the fact that 80 percent of all airplane crashes occur in the three minutes during takeoff and final eight minutes before landing. Forty percent of those accidents occur during final approach and landing. Imagine a plane having trouble during takeoff or landing ... where do they end up? In someone’s house. This is the reality of a neighborhood airport.

Although most people read about plane crashes involving large, multi-passenger commercial flights, private airplane accidents result in the most fatalities. Statistics from the National Transportation Safety Board indicate that a staggering 97 percent of aviation fatalities occur in general aviation, not in commercial flights.

The Sky Ranch airstrip has always been just that ... an airstrip. It has seen almost zero use over the past years until it received what was likely a million-dollar upgrade last fall to accommodate UPS flights during the time that Moab’s Canyonlands Field was being renovated. Prior to this upgrade, no “change of use” had been discussed. Does a million-dollar upgrade automatically change the status of this rarely used airstrip into a thriving airport? Does an almost abandoned airstrip automatically grandfather into an airport with no consideration or approval of the dramatic change in use and associated impacts?

One important factor in “change of use” is whether the essential nature or character of the existing use, or its purpose, and the new use are distinctly different and not incidental to each other. If so, then that would represent a change in the use of the land. It seems evident that going from one or two planes a year to potentially 100 planes a weekend is a significant “change of use.”

Another factor is whether or not the land use has been operative due to closure, vacancy or inactivity for an extended period of time. If this is the case, in many cases the site forfeits its existing use rights and the former use cannot be resurrected without new approval from governing bodies. Sky Ranch is going through a radical “change of use” and this should also be discussed when considering the proposed development plan.

We would love to see San Juan County benefit from the tax revenue that a new neighborhood in Spanish Valley brings. We are not opposed to having new neighbors at Sky Ranch. But by approving an airport in Spanish Valley, the county can look forward to years of complaints of low-flying aircraft, noise from approaches and take-offs, property value challenges, frustrated citizens and tax revenue tied up in lawsuits and litigation.


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.