National monument status does not necessarily ban off-road vehicles
by Steve Kadel
staff writer
Dec 13, 2012 | 3519 views | 0 0 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A proposal for a new Greater Canyonlands National Monument would encompass 1.4 million acres surrounding Canyonlands National Park. Local opponents have voiced concern that monument status would bar non-motorized travel and limit mineral exploration in the area. Map courtesy of The Salt Lake Tribune
A proposal for a new Greater Canyonlands National Monument would encompass 1.4 million acres surrounding Canyonlands National Park. Local opponents have voiced concern that monument status would bar non-motorized travel and limit mineral exploration in the area. Map courtesy of The Salt Lake Tribune
slideshow
Some local all-terrain vehicle enthusiasts have voiced fears that they will be barred if a Greater Canyonlands National Monument is declared on 1.4 million acres surrounding Canyonlands National Park.

That won’t happen, according to a spokesman for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, the controversial Utah monument designated by President Clinton in 1996.

Of the 908 miles approved for recreational use in the Grand Staircase monument, 553 miles are open to ATVs and motorcycles, said Larry Crutchfield. In addition, he said existing uses such as oil drilling continued without being affected by the new status.

More roads in Grand Staircase-Escalante may be opened to all-terrain vehicles in the future, depending on the outcome of lawsuits filed by Kane and Garfield counties and others, Crutchfield added. Those suits seek to have historic routes honored as roadways under RS 2477 designation.

Crutchfield said a Kanab-area four-wheel drive club was concerned when monument status was declared at Grand Staircase, but most of that stemmed from confusion over which routes were open to motorized travel and which weren’t.

Response from off-road drivers over the years has been generally supportive, Crutchfield said. “Almost every four-wheeler is opposed to driving cross-country.”

However, the president of a Kanab off-road vehicle club says members aren’t happy with the Staircase monument. He acknowledged many miles of trails remain open, but said motor vehicles are banned on other routes.

“They did close a lot of roads,” Tony Wright said. “We lost a lot of good roads we had been using for years. It hasn’t worked well for us.”

Part of the problem, he said, was that people from outside the local area set up a recreation plan that determined which roads would be open to motor vehicles.

“There was no input from local people,” Wright said.

He noted that five additional roads have been approved for motor vehicle use through RS 2477 lawsuits, and he hopes more will be added in the future. He also issued a warning to other recreation users about possible monument status.

“They close (trails) to motorists and the next thing they’ll go after is hikers,” he said.

Opponents from the Moab-based Sagebrush Coalition also pointed to what they called the loss of commercial access to 2 trillion tons of coal in Grand Staircase when it became a national monument. But Moab resident Bonnie Crysdale, a retired U.S. Geological Survey employee, rejected that contention in a letter to The Times-Independent.

“When I was working as a geologist for the USGS, an acquaintance at the Bureau of Mines was involved in studying the coal removal plan, and this person told me that all of the coal to be extracted was to be shipped overseas (none for domestic use), and that the Bureau of Mines would not issue a permit because it was so environmentally destructive,” Crysdale wrote. “So even if the monument had never been granted, a permit to mine would probably never have been issued.”

Proponents of monument status at Canyonlands point to better preservation of sensitive habitat as a benefit of increased regulation. The Outdoor Industry Association sent a letter to President Obama last month urging him to declare monument status surrounding Canyonlands.

“The future of our outdoor recreation economy depends on protecting iconic landscapes – such as Greater Canyonlands – where people go to recreate,” the letter stated. “And monument proclamation is an important and effective way to provide the protection that is needed.”
Share This Article |

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.