Public lands delight...
Aug 15, 2013 | 1024 views | 0 0 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I am grateful for the visit last Friday by Congressmen Bishop and Chaffetz. It was great to see such a large and diverse crowd, as well as see the bravery and civility that we can exhibit even when emotions are strong.

Chris Baird’s comments about the need to overlay water maps with potential use maps, as well as linking any legislation to funding for the long overdue water study make good sense. I am skeptical about Chaffetz’s assertion that tar sands and fracking will lead to “energy independence.” Does this mean that not a drop will leave the U.S.? I’d like that in writing please.

I support wilderness and quiet desert landscapes as well as the careful and sustainable use of area resources. I purposely did not don a yellow wilderness badge, nor do I sport a “sagebrush rebel” bumper sticker because I am afraid that, like Dr. Suess’s Sneetches, these merely promote “other-ism,” making us enemies and therefore vulnerable to outside influence and money.

We heard good points by both “sides” and I remain hopeful that compromise and cool heads will prevail. In the end I believe all of us are “Sagebrush Revelers” (“rev’el.er n. take keen delight.” – Oxford Desk Dictionary).

—Audrey Graham

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.