Responsible spending…
Nov 01, 2012 | 1553 views | 0 0 comments | 1149 1149 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I am the architect that developed contract documents for the recent Red Rock Elementary demolition and current high school soccer facility improvements. In reading last week’s letter titled “Irresponsible spending…,” I thought it might be helpful to clarify some of the references to Grand County School District’s spending on these recent capital improvements.

The school district paid a contractor $147,440 to demolish Red Rock Elementary through a publicly advertised, competitive bid process. The majority of the “…cost of over $311,000,” was spent in abating hazardous material, i.e., asbestos.

In a short amount of time, the vacant RRE was a target for vandals. There were several entry points, i.e., broken windows and doors boarded up by the district and re-broken, where vandals were in fact entering the vacant building and causing damage – their graffiti messages were “colorful,” to say the least. Since school districts are self-insured through the state, one can only speculate at the cost to taxpayers for settling a claim brought by a vandal that was injured in the course of occupying, by whatever means, this vacated building owned by the school district.

The $750,000 value quoted as being spent on “upgrading parking lots and soccer bleachers” is actually being spent to provide a new 100-plus space parking lot, a tiered grass seating area at the southeast corner of the soccer field and a new toilet/storage/concession building – all accessible to persons with disabilities. These new facilities will serve soccer game spectators and visitors to the high school site. Previously, game spectators were provided with a porta-potty for sanitary needs and graduation visitors unable to find space in the high school parking lot had to park in neighboring subdivisions or undeveloped dirt fields.

Yes, teachers teach, but buildings (and even site improvements) facilitate our children’s education experience. Please consider this too when you vote.

—Jim Dresslar


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.