The Balanced Rock of government...
Oct 25, 2012 | 640 views | 0 0 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I took a walk around Balanced Rock the other evening to photograph, but all I could think of was the upcoming election and the debate over the form our county government might take. I like analogies.

Balanced Rock seems a lot like our current, much to our mutual benefit, mostly non-partisan form of government. As you walk around the rock it maintains its balance. Erosion is ever working upon it, yet it stands in good light. That good light is to be had on all sides. Sometimes the light is flat. Sometimes the rock is in silhouette (meaning the details are hard to see). Often, it is just plain glorious.

Not all angles are agreeable to my sense of composition. Viewed from many angles I can make a choice about where I stand. I do not always agree with any one voice or decision of our current county government. However, I am VERY comfortable with most of the decisions that are made on our behalf because I know with 7 members representing an ever-diverse population, that most, if not all points of view are heard and considered.

The proposed measure to “study” what basically means returning to a 3-member council might mean for the community is like a 3-legged dog. It just doesn’t run that well. We feel bad for it, and in its frustration it often rises up to bite us in the butt.

Let’s remember, that in 1993 we studied the then 3-member form of government and found it lacking. There is no need to study the difference again. We’ve been there. We’ve done that.

The “Vote Yes” sign reads, “responsible citizens ask questions.” That’s what the current council does. Many questions from many points of view. That is how transparency in government is created.

The current move to create a study seems a thinly veiled smokescreen to put the power in the hands of a few with partisan political agenda. If the initiative had been authored by a non-partisan committee I might have listened. Such is not the case.

Let all voices be heard. Vote “No” to the proposed change in county government.

—Bruce Hucko

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.