Deeper context...
Dec 20, 2012 | 1186 views | 0 0 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I read with interest the discussion regarding changing the name of Negro Bill Canyon to William Grandstaff Canyon. It is a discussion that is a lot more telling about the respondents than it is about our illustrious pioneer, who happened to be an African American.

Old Bill must be laughing himself silly watching white folks argue over just how he would wish to be commemorated. A black man in Utah – how strange!

Probably not politically correct to refer to someone in such racial terms. But then again, Bill’s surname, “Grandstaff,” was most likely the result of being the property of one George Grandstaff, a slaveholder of Shenandoah, Va. In census records William didn’t even have a name; he was simply referred to as a “male” of a given age, who was “mulatto.” One of 10 slaves owned by Mr. George Grandstaff.

Herein lies the sad truth – that as a result of the horrific institution of slavery, human beings like Bill Grandstaff lost everything, including their African names and the ancient clan history attached to them. So when we rail in our self-righteous indignation at terms defined in other times, perhaps we should look for the deeper context in which to define the world around us.

—Mike Benefield

Redmond, Ore.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.