Denigration Deniers Gulch...
Dec 26, 2012 | 1062 views | 0 0 comments | 774 774 recommendations | email to a friend | print
We individually pick and choose what is offensive to us. Politically correct is just as fickle.

In my lifetime the “N-word” became an unacceptable descriptor, replaced by “colored,” which in turn became incorrect and was replaced by “negro” then “afro-american” then “black” and, most recently, “African American.” Apparently, our society still requires a racial descriptor. But one that is fashionable.

Would residents of Grand County in 1885 be more likely to identify William Grandstaff or Nigger Bill? And for what? Settling the wilderness? Building a community? Leaving a legacy?

Here’s what I’ve heard: He was found squatting in the old Mormon fort when the first “real settlers” arrived. He ran cows in “Negro Bill” Canyon for a short while. He moved away. He died last century. He is, at present, completely unimportant. Really, he just plain doesn’t matter in 2013.

So let’s just relegate old Brother Bill to a historical footnote list and choose a new name for that creek that we all can agree upon. The Romans called a direct vote of the people a “plebiscite.” Grand County should have a plebiscite to decide once and for all the acceptable name for said canyon; and then everybody can just shut up about it.

I propose “Denigration Deniers Gulch.” 

I like the idea of a plaque explaining why a plaque is necessary.

—Randy Evans

Moab
Share This Article |

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.