Using color as a name...
Jan 31, 2013 | 742 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I write to urge all of us as a community to support the request to change the name of Negro Bill Canyon.

Since the request was put forward, many have questioned why the word Negro is such a big deal, since the NAACP uses it as a descriptor, since Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. himself used that term.

There are those who have been annoyed by what they consider a censorship of history, claiming that there is no negative charge around the word, and that it should remain as a part of our story of place and culture.

Proponents to keep the name also argue that Negro Bill is what William Grandstaff called himself. This bit has been proven false, but it wouldn’t matter to me, even if it were what he called himself in the age of routine racism.

It doesn’t matter that Negro is a culturally accepted improvement on the word “nigger.” The slur, the damage, isn’t in the word itself. It is in the application.

If the argument that naming a place after a person’s color were valid, that the name Negro Bill Canyon is no big deal, then how does it feel, for instance, to rename the local neighborhood known as Steenville as ‘Whitey Charlie’s Acres”?

The big deal is that we can do a lot of good with very little effort. It’s a big deal because we can impart dignity. If we intend to associate William Grandstaff with the canyon, to name it after him, then the effort, the canyon, our culture and the man himself all deserve the full measure of respect by using his full name, not his color as if it were his name.

We signal and encourage growth as a community, as a world-class destination and can preserve the truth of our history in all its colors by telling his/our story as fully as can be on a historical plaque.

—Christy Williams

Castle Valley


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.