Follow planning commission’s recommendation...
Sep 26, 2013 | 911 views | 0 0 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Along with 70 other citizens, I attended the Grand County Council’s September 17 public hearing on the request to rezone 17 acres on Murphy Lane near Old City Park. The standing-room-only crowd reflected the high emotions of those opposing Red Rock Partners’ upzone proposal.

The large turnout was reminiscent of the three previous attempts by Red Rock Partners to change the zoning of that particular property.

The council heard the comprehensive report prepared by the county’s planning and engineering staff, which concluded that the proposed zone change is not consistent with the county’s 2012 General Plan, and does not meet the 11 criteria listed in the county Land Use Code that must be considered in a zone change request. The planning department’s report emphasized that the General Plan is a tool to defend against a legal challenge of spot zoning, and provides for orderly development in the county, including the infrastructure needs of future development. The council was further informed that its non-partisan planning commission voted to recommend that the zone change be denied.

The council should follow the recommendation of its appointed planning commission, and rely on the professional expertise of its planning and engineering staff when it votes on this proposed zone change on Oct. 1. Failure to do so negates the hundreds of hours of citizen volunteers’ time and professional planners’ guidance. The job of the planning and engineering department and the non-partisan Grand County Planning Commission is to shoulder the weight of doing research and analysis to provide elected officials with objective and professional recommendations.

We are not opposed to growth in the county but disregarding the planning staff’s evaluation and the planning commission’s recommendation will lead to development that does not benefit the community. If the council believes the General Plan is broken, then they should use a public process to fix it.

A council vote on a drastic zone change proposed by one very persistent developer does not fix anything.

—Sue and Mike Kirkham

Moab


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.