Documentary examines debate over proposed uranium mill in Colorado
Nov 14, 2013 | 1037 views | 0 0 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In a scene from “Uranium Drive-In,” Ayngel Overson, who has mixed feelings about a proposed uranium mill being built in her community, is shown in a cemetery in Nucla, Colo.
In a scene from “Uranium Drive-In,” Ayngel Overson, who has mixed feelings about a proposed uranium mill being built in her community, is shown in a cemetery in Nucla, Colo.
slideshow
The Utah Film Circuit will present a Moab screening of the highly acclaimed film “Uranium Drive-In” on Thursday, Nov. 21 at 7 p.m. at Star Hall, 25 E. Center St.

The documentary tells the story of the economically devastated rural mining community of Naturita in southwestern Col­orado that finds itself hopeful for the first time in decades after a company proposes building a uranium mill nearby. The mill – the first to be built in the U.S. in 30 years – sparks an emotional debate that pits many Naturita residents against an environmental group based in nearby a resort town.

In “Uranium Drive-In,” both sides of the issues concerning uranium mining are brought to life in heart-wrenching detail. The film captures personal stories to paint a portrait of the lives of those who are affected by the issue.

Directed by Suzan Beraza, the documentary is not a story about the nuclear industry, rather, it is a “heart-wrenching story about unemployed uranium workers in an economically depressed town who are desperate for the high-paying jobs that the mill will provide,” according to the film’s website. The movie also tells the story of members of the environmental group who are “determined to fight the uranium mill, and protect the water, air and landscape from the radioactive pollution that it will potentially create.”

“Uranium Drive-In” also tells the story of those who suffer from lung disease acquired while working for the uranium industry in mines and mills that were dismantled decades ago. Uranium Drive-In is a story of hope, about people who hope for the prosperity that the nuclear industry promises, and about people who hope to save the West from the devastation the nuclear industry has wrought in the past.

“I went into the project assuming that this mill was a bad idea ... ” Beraza writes in a statement on the website. “After spending two years in this community really getting to know people and why they so desperate­ly wanted the mill, I grew to understand that the issue wasn’t nearly as black and white as I had originally assumed ...”
Share This Article |
similar stories

My View Our good public lands and employees... | 19 days ago by Tom Gagnon

Idea of passenger rail linking Moab to Salt Lake City proposed | 5 days ago by Molly Marcello
Contributing Writer

Tailings cleanup has slowed slightly after November rockslide | 12 days ago by Molly Marcello
Staff Writer

Grand County Council adopts structure for finalizing Bishop Public Lands Initiative recommendations | 12 days ago by Molly Marcello
Staff Writer

Kenneth Roberts, 1933 ~ 2015 | 12 days ago


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.