My View
County committee should involve public from the beginning in public lands discussions...
by Marc Thomas
Dec 19, 2013 | 1489 views | 0 0 comments | 22 22 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In the spring of 2013, Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) announced the kickoff of a public process in which he hoped to bring multiple stakeholders together for the purpose of drafting a bill to settle land-use disputes in eastern Utah (aka the “Utah Public Lands Initiative”). The congressman stated that he hoped all interested parties could reach a compromise that would finally resolve the decades-old struggle over protecting versus exploiting some of this country’s most stunning landscapes. This naturally includes much of the world-class public lands in and around Grand County.

As part of the initiative, Rep. Bishop asked for specific land-protection proposals from interested constituencies, including the conservation community and the counties containing much of that public land. Recently, the Grand County Council has appointed a three-person committee to work on drafting the county’s proposal. It is our hope that, as it goes about its task, the committee will pay attention to the broad and diverse range of interests of all of us who make this county our home.

As residents, property owners, business owners, retirees, and taxpayers in Grand County, we have all chosen to live, work, play, and raise our families here for the most obvious reason. There is simply no place in the world like the amazing redrock and desert landscapes of Grand County, Utah. It is this land that elevates our spirit, provides our home, our recreation, and, in many cases, our very livelihood.

While we recognize that competing interests may not always agree, we also believe there is a common thread that draws together many residents of Grand County: love of the land. That is the sentiment that motivates so many of us to try to protect it – not only for the present generation, but for future generations who will not have a voice at Congressman Bishop’s table. We are also aware that, because the land belongs to the public, we are stewards of it for all Americans, and, increasingly, for a world community.

Those are the reasons that we urge the county council to follow a thorough and transparent procedure in its deliberations. Openness and careful scrutiny of all alternatives will garner the strongest public support, because they will insure that all voices and ideas are heard.

To that end, we suggest that:

• The committee seeks public input from the very beginning of its work. This can be accomplished in a number of ways. Its meetings can be open to the public, or the minutes of meetings can be made available for public response.

• The committee presents a draft proposal to the public in an open forum, again giving the people of Grand County an opportunity to respond. This preliminary draft could include alternative scenarios to evaluate.

• The committee accepts and incorporates public comments into its draft.

• Only after this public vetting should the committee present a final proposal for county council approval.

In sum, we believe that, whatever the final outcome of the Utah Public Lands Initiative, it ought to be the result of an open-minded, balanced procedure, one that gives it the stamp of legitimacy while at the same time avoiding any appearance of cronyism or favoritism. We hope that the final outcome will ensure the long-term economic vitality, physical beauty, and unmatched quality of life in eastern Utah, for those are the very characteristics that brought us here in the first place.

The following Grand County residents have signed onto this letter:

Lisa Albert, Ashley Anderson, Mike and Jean Binyon, Michael Carter, Sandy Cornell, Sue deVall, Dave Erley, Sarah Fields, Kate Finneran, Dee Gulledge, Pam Hackley, Lew and Sandy Hinchman, Wayne Hoskisson, Robert Kerchen, Nancy Kurtz, Bob Lippman, Bill Love, Carol Mayer, Kay and Dave McLean, Sara Melnicoff, Lynette Merrill, Kiley Miller, Thea Nordling, Jason Pronovost, Bill Rau, Albey Reiner, Rita Rumrill, John Rzeczyki, Gail Solomon, Carol Stockham, Mike Stringham, Mary Suarez, Eric Trenbeath, Terri Ann Tibbitts, Marc Thomas, Kevin Walker, Dick and Deb Walter, Brooke Williams, Terry Tempest Williams.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.