BLM mulls ban of rope swinging at Corona Arch
by Rudy Herndon
Staff Writer
Jun 12, 2014 | 3119 views | 0 0 comments | 35 35 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rope swinging is a popular activity at Corona Arch, but now that the area is in federal hands, land managers are trying to determine if it should be allowed to continue there.

U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Supervisory Outdoor Recreation Planner Rock Smith said his agency is working on an Environmental Assessment of recreational activities at the arch and other popular sites.

“We’re trying to decide what activities are appropriate at these spectacular natural areas,” Smith said June 11.

The BLM acquired Corona Arch and other iconic landmarks through the Utah Recreational Land Exchange Act of 2009. In return, Utah’s School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) picked up energy-rich lands that the BLM previously managed in the Uintah Basin.

BLM officials have said that the exchange, which was finalized earlier this year, will preserve more than 25,000 acres of prime recreational areas in the area.

By anyone’s estimation, the dazzling Corona Arch is one of the most important ones.

Smith estimated that 40,000 hikers visit the 140-foot tall arch near Moab each year, and based on those numbers, the BLM has identified it as a hiking focus area.

“That implies that people will have a certain experience in that area, and the question is whether they can have that experience [with rope swinging],” Smith said. “If there is an impact to their hikes, it could be considerable.”

Corona Arch has been the site of several serious rope-swinging incidents, including a fatal swinging accident in March 2013 that claimed the life of 22-year-old West Jordan resident Kyle Lee Stocking.

More recently, a 25-year-old New York man sustained head injuries when he fell about 70 feet during a May 4 rope-swinging accident. The man, who was not wearing a helmet at the time, was later flown to St. Mary’s Hospital in Grand Junction for treatment of his injuries.

As serious as that incident was, Smith said that the issue of safety is not driving the BLM’s review.

“It’s not the emphasis behind this,” he said. “It’s really: is the activity appropriate or not?”

As part of its review, the BLM will also be taking a closer look at recreational activities in the Gemini Bridges area, where someone has set up a zip line. Currently, there are no prohibitions on zip lines or other high-adrenaline sports in that area, according to Smith.

“Not unless it damages resources, no,” he said.

According to Smith, any proposals that the BLM ultimately comes up with will be limited in scope.

“We’re not banning these activities across our field office,” he said. “We’re trying to determine where they’re not appropriate.”

Smith expects that members of the public will have the chance to comment on the agency’s Environmental Assessment at some point in the near future.

“We’ll probably finish it within the next few months, I think,” he said.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.