Fourth option needed for public lands...
Jun 19, 2014 | 751 views | 0 0 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I’d like to point out to the County Council candidates who endorsed the second option of the Bishop Public Lands bill who may have been trying to take a “middle road” position, that there, in fact, should have been four options. The third option was widely criticized by many for not going far enough to protect natural resources and the recreational industry.

Recently, I’ve tried to road bike or hike and have given up due to heavy truck traffic and noisy UTVs. Again this morning we counted seven huge tanker trucks, two flatbeds, a water truck and numerous pickups in the first mile of our road bike ride on state Route 313. UTV’s have made Sand Flats and Kane Springs roads miserable experiences for any activity.

Incredibly, Dead Horse Point was cited by the Utah Office of Outdoor Recreation director as a success story for balance between industry and recreation. (He must not be a road biker or mind gas flares).

The outdoor recreation industry annually generates $12 billion and 122,000 jobs in Utah, and $646 billion nationally. Do we really want to drive them away for a few jobs in the extractive industry? And if low-paying tourist jobs are an issue, let’s work towards a living wage for all.

We get thousands upon thousands of runners and bikers and their friends and families here for events. They come, they spend money, and they leave without trashing our land or stressing our city and county services. Let’s reclaim the clean beauty, quiet, and night stars they’ve come here to see and enjoy.

—Darcey Brown

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.