Who’s the real ‘enemy’?
Aug 21, 2014 | 1335 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The other day my wife and I drove down the Kane Creek road, as we like to do. At the crossing of Kane Creek, we saw a front-end loader working on the crossing, smoothing out the road where it had been cut by the previous night’s flood.

On the way back we stopped at our favorite spring to get a drink of refreshing water, and behind us came the front-end loader, driven by a BLM maintenance man. We chatted, and he said he loved to stop at the same spring, and mentioned how he had been the one who placed a nice flat rock below the spring so people could stand there to get a drink.

We noted how swollen the creek was, and he mentioned that earlier that day he had pulled out a car that had tried to cross the creek and gotten struck. After we said our goodbyes and went our separate ways, it struck me that this public servant was exactly what San Juan County commissioners Bruce Adams and Phil Lyman, and Grand County Council member Lynn Jackson would call “the enemy.” Others would go further, treating BLM employees with scorn and even threatening them with violence.

But who are the real “enemies” here? (I hesitate to use that loaded word, but since commissioner Adams chose to portray people who disagree with him as the “enemy,” that’s what I’ll use.) Was it the friendly BLM man, the improver of springs, rescuer of stranded drivers, who lives and works in the community? Or is it the selfish, short-sighted people who think that an accident of birth gives them more rights and more say in what happens to the public lands that belong to all U.S. citizens, who would sell off Grand County and San Juan County for a quick buck to out-of-state developers, miners, and drillers?

Southeastern Utah has scenery and vistas that are unlike any in the world, and people come from all over the world to see them and be inspired. Yet far too many people can’t see beyond their own wallets and would destroy these precious, fragile landscapes just for a short-term gain, and would — to use another phrase they would no doubt recognize — “sell their birthright for a mess of pottage.”

And once the miners, drillers, and developers are done — and all of the money gained goes out of the state, not into the local economy — then what do we have? Strip malls like Anytown, USA, piles of toxic tailings, and poisoned water. Is it really worth it?

—R. Dale Webb


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.