Moab City Council approves Nob Hill rezone
by Rose Egelhoff
The Times-Independent
Feb 02, 2017 | 2347 views | 0 0 comments | 358 358 recommendations | email to a friend | print

The city council voted Jan. 23 to approve a requested rezone of property located at 46 and 76 Nob Hill Lane. The rezone will change the parcel from split zoning — C-3 central commercial and R-3 multi-family residential, to a C-5 neighborhood commercial zone.

Council member Heila Ersahdi recused herself from the vote due to her status as an employee of the applicant, Four Corners Community Behavioral Health (FCCBH).

FCCBH intends to purchase the property to build a new clinic, a clubhouse for clients and up to nine units of FCCBH employee housing.

The city planning commission tabled the item on Dec. 8, asking for more information about whether the decision would be considered a “spot zone,” which is generally not allowed under state law.

In a letter to the planning commission on Jan. 8, Moab City Attorney Chris McAnany said rezoning of a small geographic area of land or a plot that is owned by a sole owner does not necessarily make the rezone an unlawful spot zone. It is more important that the zone change is compatible with the overall composition of the area and with the City’s General Plan and other guidance documents, he said.

The Moab City Planning Commission referred the item to the city council on Jan. 12, with a recommendation for approval.

C-5 zoning allows community establishments, schools and public buildings, cafes, apartments, gymnasiums, one- and two-family dwellings, offices and other uses, but does not allow short-term rentals.

“Probably the biggest thing is if the C-3 [area] was used for nightly rentals, that’s something that we were trying to stay completely away from,” said Moab City Planning Director Jeff Reinhart.

In the past, some developers had looked at the property and considered applying to rezone the entire parcel to C-3 central commercial, he said.

“C-5 is a transition or buffer zone to the other residential uses,” Reinhart said. “Currently we don’t have a lot of that buffering.”

The C-5 zoning will require buffering such as trees, landscaping or fencing to shield the residential units, said Reinhart

Council member Rani Derasary expressed concern that the rezone could allow another developer to use the property for commercial uses.

“I find it appealing in the aspect that it offers them the room they need to grow and to combine, and we have such a problem with employee housing,” said Derasary. “But one thing for us to keep in mind is that we’re just looking at the rezone, so ostensibly anybody could come and make a C-5 use.”

Reinhart said the R-3 portion of land could accommodate 40 to 44 residential units, creating a significant impact on the neighbors and on street traffic, even if the rezone was not approved.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.