The ruination of Lionsback...
Mar 09, 2017 | 1281 views | 0 0 comments | 139 139 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Front-page news reignites my dread about the ruination of Lionsback. I wonder how many Moabites are as disgusted, disillusioned, disappointed, and, yes, angry, as I am.

I wanted to know how this happened and when. I did learn that it took place before I came here. I would have been protesting if this was being proposed today. How was the state School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) given the OK to sell off this precious property for development? There comes a point where we have to yell, “STOP! NOT HERE! NOT EVER!”

Logically, Lionsback should have become a part of Sand Flats Recreation area. Sand Flats was recognized for the treasure that it is back in 1995 and is managed under a unique partnership between the Bureau of Land Management, Grand County and the Moab community. A true cooperative success story that we should all be proud of. Conversely, we should be ashamed of losing Lionsback.

For those of you who are mystified by the political process that allow these things to happen I urge you to research and learn. A good place to start is Jim Stiles’ “The Canyon Country Zephyr” archives: June-July 2006, “Subdivision Frenzy...Why Worry Now?” explaining how the developers simply needed Moab city to annex the SITLA’s Lionsback property to move ahead; Dec. 2008-Jan. 2009, “SITLA Looks Ahead” — you’ll read more about the workings of SITLA and Lionsback, also Cloudrock on Johnson’s Up-On-Top, plus the Spanish Valley roads to nowhere and more.

Learn all about trust lands in an internet article entitled: “The State Trust Lands” by Jon Souder and Sally Fairfax.

—Ann Ertel

Moab




Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.