Funds from local SITLA deals should stay in Grand...
Apr 06, 2017 | 1210 views | 0 0 comments | 174 174 recommendations | email to a friend | print
When Utah became a state, having agreed to give up polygamy and other strange practices, part of the deal was that 4 square miles of every section (36 square miles) would be reserved for the state to use primarily for the benefit of public schools. Hence the birth of SITLA (state School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration). Don’t know exactly when it got started, but officials were definitely asleep at the wheel in the early days. There are virtually no SITLA lands on the most valuable sections on and around the Wasatch Front. Those were previously occupied, stolen or given away — all pretty much the same thing. They know what they did.

That left the parcels in rural and southern Utah that nobody wanted or cared about, much like the vast majority of our public lands. Stuff happens and times change. Now some of these properties have become extremely valuable, and SITLA has morphed into a state agency behemoth not answerable to anyone.

Here’s the problem. By law, funds from sales, leases and trades of SITLA land have to be distributed proportionately. That means BIG school districts on the Wasatch Front that have no SITLA land, get the vast majority of the money generated in our neighborhood. That’s unfair. The money from SITLA land sales, leases and trades should go to the school districts where those lands are located.

It’s a legal thing, and will be a big fight. The rules can’t be changed just because they should be, and the powers that be on the Wasatch Front aren’t going to change anything just because it is rational or appropriate.

So this is a call to action. Contact your representatives and let them know that the proceeds reaped from SITLA land transactions should primarily benefit the counties and communities where those lands are situated. If the movement is successful, it will be a huge benefit for school districts in Grand, San Juan and other rural Utah counties.

—Steve Russell


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.