Dept. of Interior investigators pen damning report on BLM’s Dan Love
by Greg Knight
The Times-Independent
Aug 31, 2017 | 1210 views | 0 0 comments | 56 56 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Many remember Dan Love as the head law enforcement officer during the Cliven Bundy standoff in rural Nevada. In 2009, however, Love was part of Operation Cerebrus — a major law enforcement sweep targeting artifacts traffickers in the Four Corners region.

An investigative report released last week by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) is now shedding light on what Love’s involvement might have been in missing moqui marbles from the Moab, Monticello and Blanding areas.

The OIG investigated several allegations against Love, a senior law enforcement officer with the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Office of Law Enforcement and Security (OLES). According to the report, Love mishandled evidence, in the form of spheroidal iron oxide marbles that were seized as part of the 2009 investigation.

During his time as head of Operation Cerebrus, Love allegedly directed an employee to improperly remove several of the seized marbles from the OLES evidence room and give them to the senior manager. The senior manager also allegedly gave marbles as gifts to several people.

After the BLM received requests for emails and documents concerning an investigation into Love, he allegedly directed an employee to review his official BLM email account and delete any that depicted him unfavorably.

“We did not substantiate the allegation that documents had been deliberately deleted from the Google drive,” states a press release from Department of the Interior. “[An] OLES budget analyst told us she deleted documents from the drive the day before she learned about the congressional request, but we did not find that she had intended to obstruct the inquiry. We also did not find that anyone, including [Love] or members of BLM leadership, had ordered the documents deleted.”

During the OIG investigation, allegations also came to light that OLES documents were intentionally deleted from a BLM shared Google drive Love had access to — the day before a congressional request was received for them.

The investigation ultimately revealed that Love instructed his employee to remove the marbles from the evidence room and give them to him, which violated BLM and U.S. Department of the Interior evidence policy, and that Love then gave marbles to several people, including BLM employees and a contractor who had worked on a project in the OLES office.

As a result, the OIG determined that Love violated federal security and records management policies, as well as regulations and guidance related to the conduct of BLM employees.

Love declined to be interviewed by investigators during the OIG investigation.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.