Eastside residents speak out against possible Shumway annexation at city public hearing
by Rose Egelhoff
The Times-Independent
Oct 12, 2017 | 2370 views | 0 0 comments | 95 95 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A map shows the area being considered by the city for R-4 multi-family residential zoning and C-4 general commercial zoning near 500 West. 									   										 Courtesy City of Moab
A map shows the area being considered by the city for R-4 multi-family residential zoning and C-4 general commercial zoning near 500 West. Courtesy City of Moab

Moab residents turned out en masse to a public hearing at the Moab City Council on Tuesday, Oct. 5 to express their views about a proposed annexation on 500 West. The annexation proposes to add 10 acres to the city with a combination of C-4 general commercial and R-4 multi-family residential zoning, angering some neighbors.

The property, located at 936 and 1001 North 500 West, is currently a rural residential zone in Grand County. The owners have requested the property receive R-4 multi-family residential zoning for seven acres and C-4 general commercial zoning for three acres on its eastern side, near 500 West. The requested zoning would result in a new commercial zone next to a city residential zone.

Most residents spoke in opposition to the commercial zoning, emphasizing the need for more affordable housing in the community. Shumway and one other resident spoke in favor of the annexation and proposed zoning while ten residents spoke in opposition of the requested C-4 zoning.

Several more spoke in support, generally, of affordable housing.

“The General Plan does not include an affordable hotel plan, it includes an affordable housing plan,” said Allison Brown, who is member of the Moab City Planning Commission. During the public hearing Brown spoke as a resident rather than as a commissioner, adding, “Anybody who you talk to is going to say, we need more housing and this is the council’s chance to bring land into the city and treat it as housing and not as another commercial development.”

Maureen Clapper also expressed concern about the requested commercial zoning.

“There needs to be a buffer between commercial and residential ... we’re growing faster than what our town can sustain,” Clapper said. “I’m up for growth. We need to have growth in a positive way to be able to see the future and that sustainability with it.”

Kelly Shumway, who owns the property in question, and one other resident spoke in favor of the proposed zoning, noting that the property is currently a commercial industrial zone in Grand County.

“Our property is commercial industrial right now. The use is commercial industrial and we have the option to continue to use it in Grand County. So the R-4 [multi-family residential zone] that’s requested, that accommodates the high-density [housing]. An increase in affordable housing is necessary to stabilize property values and high-density workforce housing is not even possible without the appropriate zone,” Shumway said.

The City Council will consider whether to annex the property with the proposed commercial and residential zoning at their Dec. 12 meeting.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.