A reward from Donald...
Dec 07, 2017 | 1114 views | 0 0 comments | 88 88 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I am horrified at the illegal actions being taken by President Donald Trump, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and Sen. Orrin Hatch to drastically reduce our national monuments. This annihilation of large portions of the two monuments in Utah is just a precedent to what they intend to do in other states, such as Oregon and Nevada.

Typical of anything that Trump is doing, these moves are purely political in nature — undoubtedly a reward for Trump’s supporters in those states. Additionally, in the case of Bears Ears, these actions fit Trump’s agenda of discrimination against Native people and other non-whites. He continues to ignore the enormous effort a five-tribe coalition has put forth to create the monuments. These five tribal governments with ancestral ties to the region have been pleading to keep the new monument the way it is. Instead, Trump and Zinke have fully embraced the disposal of national monuments as a way to make the lands “available to the public,” as if providing it to resource extraction companies makes them more available to you and to me. Oil, gas and coal mining are not “traditional uses” that make our public lands more “available” to you and me.

There are no two ways about it. Native traditional uses and sacred sites are under attack by these politicians and their industry friends, and this remains the very reason tribes continue to back monument designation. A move to eliminate large portions of Bears Ears perpetuates historic injustice and disrespect for Native American tribes and is a betrayal to all Americans. Additionally, a move to eliminate large portions of Grand Staircase-Escalante will unleash, in Zinke’s own words, “several billion tons of coal and large oil deposits” further exacerbating global warming with increasingly dramatic effects on our planet, let alone giving away rights to ghost highways claimed by some Utah counties that would thwart resource conservation.

Lastly, this illegal move flaunts public opinion and desires. Ninety-nine percent of 2.8 million people participating in their sham comment review period said “leave our national monuments intact.” Trump’s action is racist, vindictive, damaging and serves only as one of his rewards for the oil extraction industry and red-state delegates that supported him — as well as a means to punish those that did not.

—Margie Lopez Read


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.