The theater is full...
Jan 18, 2018 | 1073 views | 0 0 comments | 81 81 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In response to the story, “Liss sparks support for Arches options,” I ask, are Moab’s “tourism titans” aware of the National Park Service’s priorities? The NPS’s first and foremost goal is to leave the park unimpaired, not for tomorrow, not for anyone’s economic gain, but to protect it as a national treasure for all future generations.

The outcry about the “reservation system” is greed at its worst. If you ask any hotel owner or tour operator 20 years ago if they would prefer to have two decades of year-over-year growth, they’d be ecstatic. Now, 20 years later, that success is not enough, and that kind of growth cannot go on forever. Yes, the NPS needs to “consider” impacts on physical, cultural, and economic environments, but it does have legal authority and precedent to prioritize the integrity of park resources first.

Almost without exception courts have ruled that NPS has ultimate discretion over how to protect and manage this nation’s most valued assets for the long run. The 1996 case of Bicycle Trails Council of Marin v. Babbitt upheld the NPS decision to ban mountain bikes in Golden Gate National Recreation Area. There was also NRA v. Potter in 1986, International Snowmobile Manufacturer’s Association v. Norton in 2004, River Runners for Wilderness v. Martin in 2007 and Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Jewell in 2013. These cases differ in their issues, but their rulings are the same: when user interests conflict with the integrity of the resource, the NPS has the authority to act in the interest of the parks, not in the recreational or economic interests of special interest groups.

Economies ebb and flow. No one is entitled to rent Jeeps profitably for all time. The “reservation system” at Arches is not just aimed to reduce vehicle congestion, but also congestion around the park. Arches is small, only 3 percent the size of Yellowstone, with less than 17 miles of trail. It cannot accommodate the 1.6 million (and growing) visitors it receives annually. To quote Kim Heacox, “If the finest hotels can have ‘no vacancy,’ if the greatest concert halls can have limited seating, then why not our national parks? The theater is full you are invited to our next performance.”

PT Lathrop


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.