Thoughts on the reservation system...
Feb 22, 2018 | 728 views | 0 0 comments | 44 44 recommendations | email to a friend | print
First, I would like to thank Lynn Jackson for his comprehensive perspective on Michael Liss’s ideas for solving Arches National Park’s traffic congestion problem, published in last week’s The Times-Independent. He is better informed than many of us with regard to the feasibility of Liss’s proposal, as well as the unrealistic time frame Mr. Liss envisions for its implementation.

In the last year or so of my term as Moab’s mayor (1998-2002), I had an opportunity to participate in the stakeholders’ meetings to discuss the removal of the uranium tailings pile. At that time, it was my understanding that, while the pile actually “belonged” to the U.S. Department of Energy, it was assumed that it would eventually be turned over to Grand County for whatever community-serving project seemed to offer the best use of it.

One of the many suggestions being considered was a central transportation area, which would be the focus for both shuttles to Arches and a possible bus project between the area and Moab’s business district. Undoubtedly, Mr. Liss, (though not a local resident at the time) was in the area applying for approval of his Cloud Rock project on Johnson’s Up-on-Top and would have seen mention in the newspaper of the suggested options for the use of that land. He did not “invent” the concept of using it for a transportation center, however.

After my term as mayor ended, I had the privilege of serving from 2002 to 2015 as library manager for the National Park Service Southeastern Utah Group’s library system. Although not an official NPS employee, I had the chance to attend a number of meetings to discuss solutions to the park congestion problems, which were a serious matter even then — and have only become worse. I was impressed with the depth of Superintendent Kate Cannon’s exploration of all possible solutions to this problem that long ago. I have the utmost admiration for her dedication and willingness to make the wisest decision she could. She is a thorough and thoughtful administrator of the parks, as well as a valuable member of this community. She has a vested interest in addressing the issue in terms of not just the effect on the parks but the community, as well.

I have had occasion recently to talk with a number of visitors to our area and have heard their complaints about the crowding at Arches. If word about Arches National Parks’ overcrowding becomes its “national reputation,” park visitation numbers will drop and that will seriously affect local businesses far into the future. I believe that the risk to Moab’s economy is far greater if the park doesn’t implement the reservation plan.

I know that the park service will continue to work with the community for the best method to address the obvious congestion while serving park visitors and managing resources, but something needs to be done now. The reservation system is a rather simple fix and can easily be replaced if a more satisfactory plan is found.

I truly feel that visitors will be willing to overlook the inconvenience of a reservation system if they know that the park service is doing its best to find a better long-term solution.

—Karla Hancock

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.