Council again postpones support of Arches reservation plan
by John Hales
The Times-Independent
Mar 01, 2018 | 1380 views | 0 0 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Moab City Council has failed to pass, for the second time in as many weeks, a resolution supporting a traffic-congestion management plan for Arches National Park that would require the park’s visitors to make reservations.

​ Though the inclination of council members appeared to support the plan, they were leery of doing so after several impassioned comments were made during the public participation portion of the meeting. The delay also came after an opportunity presented itself for park managers and the plan’s opponents — primarily business owners who feel threatened — to come together for greater understanding.

​ “I don’t think you should come out for or against it. That’s not your job,” Cricket Green told council members. “I think it’s ridiculous that you’re even considering this.”

​ Green attended the Tuesday meeting representing Twisted Jeep Rentals and Tours. She was one of many residents, from more than a dozen businesses, who attended the meeting in a show of solidarity against the Arches reservation plan, urged to show up en masse by an email sent out earlier that day by the Moab Chamber of Commerce.

​ “We all know it’s not okay the way it is,” said Brendon Cameron, who manages the City Market grocery store. But, he said, “Let’s get some solutions that will work for everybody.”

​ Cameron, also at the suggestion of the chamber, wrote a letter to the council. He wrote, and reiterated the point in person at the meeting, that for four months of the year, the grocery store makes little profit, yet is able to keep its 135 employees in their jobs because of the money made during the tourist season.

​ “Without this increase during the season we cannot grow, remodel, etc.” Cameron wrote. “We will have to lay off associates.”

​ A majority of business leaders — at least those who have expressed anything at all on the subject — are against the current reservation-system plan, feeling that it will discourage people from coming to Moab.

​ Chamber of Commerce Board President Jared Anderson said that at the chamber’s last meeting, a vote was taken: Those in support of the reservation plan, zero; those opposed, “about 50,” he said.

​ The foundation of the area’s tourism economy is Arches, business and economy leaders say.

​ Josh Green, of Moab Cowboy Country Offroad Adventures, said his company exists as a “side thing” people do while in Moab to see what they came for. “Eighty percent of our customers come in and tell us they’re here for Arches National Park.”

​ “It will hurt us. It will cut us,” said Jeremy Day, whose employer, TKO Hospitality, manages four hotels in Moab.

​ Austena Fugit, representing another five hotels, said the plan, without even being implemented yet, could have a negative impact. “We rely on foreign international travelers,” she said.

According to Fugit these tourists are such an important part of the economy that they have their own industry-lingo acronym: F.I.T.s.

​ “F.I.T. operators are hesitant to market us for 2019,” she said.

​ Fewer foreign tourists mean more empty rooms, which means fewer employees. “We don’t want to let employees go,” Fugit said.

​ But the plan’s supporters maintain the economy won’t be hit that hard by the plan. The “boom” period would just be more consistently spread out through the season.

​ Even if people displaced by the reservation requirement don’t reschedule, said Council Member Mike Duncan, it would mean only a 10-percent drop in visitation. “To my ears, it does not sound like a disaster,” Duncan said.

​ Though there were two people who did speak in favor of the plan, their comments were dwarfed by the number in opposition.

​ “This is a hard moment,” said Mayor City Mayor Emily Niehaus, when it came time for a vote on the resolution.

​ “What I’m hearing is people are worried about their businesses,” Council Member Tawny Knuteson-Boyd said. “I think those people deserve to be heard in more depth … we’re in no rush to pass this.”

​ But Duncan countered, “How long can we keep tabling this before it becomes a non-issue?”

​ Arches National Park Superintendent Kate Cannon answered that question in part. She said the National Park Service was still reviewing hundreds of comments it had received in the fall. “It takes a long time for us to go through all those comments and apply them,” she said.

​ Cannon said she didn’t expect a final decision on the plan until at least June.​ She also hinted that although the formal comment period was over, there may be room for informal comment during the current review period.

​ “I think we’re open to listening to ideas all along,” she said.

​ Cannon asked Anderson if the chamber would be willing to host an event where questions and concerns could be addressed.

​ “I think there’s a considerable amount of misunderstanding,” she said.

Anderson agreed to that idea. “I think that would be great for the business community.”

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.