City blinks, but doesn’t balk, at road to serve future USU campus
by John Hales
The Times-Independent
Mar 01, 2018 | 1732 views | 0 0 comments | 40 40 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Moab City Council has approved a $143,000 contract for engineering services on a road that will service the future Utah State University-Moab campus, after the city’s attorney issued a strong caution against doing otherwise.

Moab City Attorney Chris McAnany intimated at a meeting Tuesday that refusing to award the contract could torpedo the entire campus project.

“My concern for this council is that if you balk at this particular planning expenditure or design expenditure, you may jeopardize future commitments on the part of the university, and that they may question the city’s motivation or its overall commitment toward this project.”

McAnany’s comment came as council members questioned the city’s role in providing a 1,900-foot road in the area of the proposed campus, according to agreements among the city, the county, the university and the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration.

Those agreements stipulate that the City of Moab will provide $450,000 cash or in-kind donation toward roads and infrastructure for the campus project. Since 2011, said Moab City Communications Manager Lisa Church on Wednesday, the city has been putting money aside for that purpose.

Grand County and SITLA would also provide their own portions of matching buy-in for a $1.5-million infrastructure-funding package from the Community Impact Board.

But engineering and designing the road is an undertaking of the city alone. That worried some council members who queried if it would all be for nothing if, for some reason, the campus project didn’t happen or otherwise failed.

“Is there a chance … we end up building a bridge to nowhere?” Council Member Mike Duncan asked.

Moab City Engineer Chuck Williams and Special Projects Manager Amy Weiser both said no. The road would also service a master-planned community SITLA has in mind for the area.

However, asked Council Member Kalen Jones, suppose the USU campus doesn’t come off as planned: Would SITLA still follow through with its plan as currently envisioned?

“My concern is that SITLA does have this mandate to maximize profits,” Jones said. “I haven’t seen business planning or academic planning for the new campus, so I’m not sure if it’s going to succeed. So in the absence of that, I’m not sure if SITLA will fall back on its mandate.”

Jones feared SITLA could become a, “profit-generating machine, rather than an asset to the community.” For instance, while SITLA’s plan now includes an affordable-housing component, Jones wondered aloud if it could give way to higher-revenue options for SITLA if affordable housing wasn’t needed for the college campus.

In the event the campus did not happen, the city would have been on the hook for what, under regular circumstances, would have been paid for by developers themselves, not the city.

Both Weiser and McAnany said there was a long history to take into account, however.

Weiser provided a timeline going back nearly 10 years that included several phases of planning, studies and agreements between city, county, university and SITLA. “This is extremely time sensitive,” she said.

“You’ve got this long process that’s been underway for a number of years to kind of develop this campus,” McAnany said. “Past councils have certainly made commitments incrementally.”

The council would be ill advised, he said, to go back on them now.

“On its face, it’s just a contract for planning or engineering design, but it’s the tail end of a lot of other things that preceded that,” he said. “As your counsel, I’d be leading you astray if I didn’t say, ‘Hey, you want to be careful about this,’ regarding what past councils have decided to do.”

The council approved the contract on a 3-1 vote, with Duncan voting against.


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.