Sky Ranch incompatible with San Juan development plan...
Mar 01, 2018 | 600 views | 0 0 comments | 34 34 recommendations | email to a friend | print
​ I live in Spanish Valley and my property borders the proposed Sky Ranch airport. I moved here for the peace and quiet. However, the valley’s tranquility will be compromised if the proposed Sky Ranch “fly in” development is approved.

​ San Juan County is currently working with Landmark Designs on a development plan for this part of the valley. Creating a smart development plan is a great idea. However, developing an airport in the middle of a residential area is a bad idea and incompatible with Landmark’s plan. I cannot see any urban planner putting an elementary school off the end of an airport runway or an airport in the middle of a growing residential neighborhood.

​ My concerns include safety, noise, and reduced property values for the residents and property owners near the airport — which will lead to reduced tax revenue for the county. Last November we had an out-of-town pilot (which is your perfect demographic for the Sky Ranch development) crash on the nearby Old Airport runway. ​

The strong, shifting winds in the valley are notoriously dangerous. Who is going to be liable when a plane ends up in someone’s living room or in an elementary school’s classroom? Is the developer or San Juan County going to take responsibility? I hope we never get to the point where we have to ask that question.

​ Doesn’t it make sense to steer future air traffic, including visiting amateur pilots, to the renovated Canyonlands Field to avoid the safety and residential conflicts that the Sky Ranch airport will certainly bring to the valley.

​ If the developer really wants a “fly-in” destination, maybe he should consider developing the project out of the valley, away from residential neighborhoods. This would give potential investors the opportunity to “opt in” to the associated noise and safety issues of an airport. The proposed Sky Ranch would force current residents to live with the consequences — in perpetuity — for something they never signed up for.

​ A different location would also remove the black cloud hanging over Landmark’s proposed urban plan and let everyone get what he or she wants. If the Sky Ranch airport moves forward, I see a future with a lot of unhappy property owners, potential court battles and potential fatal airplane accidents. Let’s not “wait and see” — let’s have smart urban planning starting right now.

—Nick Lee


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.