A contemplative, quiet experience?
Mar 07, 2018 | 817 views | 0 0 comments | 29 29 recommendations | email to a friend | print
As the owner of a small business in Moab, which relies on the tourist dollar to stay afloat, I’ve followed the debate over a reservation plan at Arches National Park with interest. Here are my thoughts: The National Park Service bears no responsibility to support local businesses via unlimited growth and unlimited use. Most National Park units pre-date the gateway communities near those parks. Businesses congregate because national parks draw people. Nowhere in the NPS mandate does it say that the managers of these special areas provide for the well being of businesses outside their park boundaries.

The National Park Service mandate does state that managers must protect the historic and natural features within park areas for the enjoyment of visitors now and in the future. Many parks have reached their carrying capacity. Park resources suffer irreparable harm and over-crowding makes it impossible for visitors to have a meaningful, memorable visit. Try visiting Zion, Yosemite, Grand Canyon, Yellowstone, Arches, Shenandoah or Glacier during peak season. It is beyond the pale.

The congestion, the search for a parking spot, the noise, the trash, all make for a theme-park like atmosphere rather than a contemplative, quiet experience which NPS areas previously provided. Arches National Park will be a leader in park management by implementing a reservation system that provides visitors the opportunity to experience some level of solitude.

Indeed, by spreading out visitation throughout the day, I argue that local businesses may actually see increased revenue. The average visitor at Arches currently goes through the gate between 9 a.m. and noon. They spend a few hours then speed their way to the next stop on the Grand Circle. With a reservation system dispersing use, visitors perhaps will spend an extra day in Moab. Those entering the park later in the day won’t have time to get to Cortez, Colo., or Flagstaff, Ariz., that same day and may well enjoy the amenities Moab offers.

The travel council could use a portion of their multi-million dollar budget to publicize the reservation system so few people will be turned away. As a small business owner, it is my responsibility to keep my business afloat — not the government’s.

—Andy Nettell


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.