Ken’s Lake users may see 30% cut
Snow pack: 62% Precipitation: 51%
by John Hales
The Times-Independent
Mar 08, 2018 | 1949 views | 0 0 comments | 63 63 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Ken’s Lake was at about 50 percent of capacity as of March 1. The low level, combined with low snowpack in the mountains, means water restrictions ahead for Ken’s Lake water users. 			   Photo by John Hales
Ken’s Lake was at about 50 percent of capacity as of March 1. The low level, combined with low snowpack in the mountains, means water restrictions ahead for Ken’s Lake water users. Photo by John Hales
slideshow


Ken’s Lake irrigation water users may see water restrictions of 30 percent this year under a plan being considered by the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency.

The agency’s board held off from making any firm decision about water restrictions at a meeting on Thursday, March 1, choosing instead to wait two weeks and see if storms anticipated over the weekend would change things at all.

“One or two storms could put us in a different position,” said GWSSA Manager Dana Van Horn, as she explained an irrigation-water restriction recommendation she had developed.

That recommendation would delay the start of the irrigation season until sometime between April 1 and April 15, which is up to a month later than the “right-on-time” start date of March 15. After water becomes available, users would be restricted to 70 percent of their actual allotment.

Van Horn prefaced the recommendation with a presentation about the current water situation — or non-water situation, as the case may be.

Van Horn estimated there would be a 1,183 acre-feet shortage of water this year, which is about 32 percent shy of what’s needed to fully supply water users’ allotments.

The problem, she pointed out, is that Ken’s Lake is already low, but so is the snowpack that could recharge it this spring and summer.

As of last week, Ken’s Lake was at half capacity, and runoff from snowpack — at least as it then existed — isn’t expected to replenish it sufficiently. According to figures Van Horn presented, the snow-water equivalent (or, “how wet the snow is,” as Van Horn explained) is 62 percent of the median. Since the water year began in October, the area’s precipitation is 51 percent of average.

Going back at least six years, Van Horn said, this is the first time that both Ken’s Lake and mountain snowpack have been so low (though a chart she presented showed 2015 came close). That fact lent itself to some difficulty in developing the recommendation. “It’s really hard to make a determination on trending when the trend is not like any other year,” she said.

She emphasized that her numbers were estimates and projections, and that things could always — and hopefully — change.

With the current situation, however, GWSSA board member Dale Weiss became concerned about the possibility of Ken’s Lake running completely dry.

“Is there a way to keep people from using so much water at the beginning that we have nothing left at the end?” she asked.

The short answer from other board members was no, “At least, not with this recommendation,” Van Horn said.

Board President Dan Pyatt said, “We feel we’re going on the conservative side.”

However, there is still a concern about what Board Member Ken Helfenbein called “panic watering,” when people use all of the water they can up front because they’re scared about not having any later. “We need to address that,” he said.

The board plans to adopt a final plan for water restrictions at its meeting on March 15.

In the meantime, said Board Member Preston Paxman, “I’m hoping we don’t have to restrict, that we get a heck of a snowstorm.”


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.