It bodes ill for democracy...
Mar 29, 2018 | 570 views | 0 0 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print
According to researchers at Harvard University, democracies die when people refuse to accept the legitimacy of their rivals and try to alter the rules of the political game to benefit their own interests. The events surrounding the passage of House Bill 224, as described last week in The Times-Independent, are a textbook example of the violation of democratic norms. In one of that bill’s provisions, the state legislature specifically targeted Grand County’s long-standing form of government, which was chosen by local voters and reaffirmed twice at the polls.

Before the ink on Gov. Gary Herbert’s signature was dry, Lynn Jackson and several others had filed a petition that effectively pre-empts efforts by our elected representatives to study and propose alternatives to what Jackson derisively called “our goofy little system” of government. As a result, his self-appointed “committee,” composed exclusively of Republican Party loyalists, will drive the political agenda. If voters in November refuse to ratify what this cabal puts before them, our county government will become a three-person commission by default.

Of the many things that are wrong with this picture, the following stand out. First, there is the fact that a non-elected group was allowed, if not invited, to hijack the political process. What they were unable to achieve openly through the ballot box they are trying to accomplish stealthily, through a procedural trick. Second is the fact that the Jackson faction learned about the legislative developments affecting Grand County before even our council chair was informed of them. The unseemly haste with which they sought control suggests, at the very least, that political insiders tipped them off. Finally, there is the fact that key features of Grand County’s system of representation — recall elections, term limits and non-partisan ballots — were singled out in the legislation.

Historically, these measures arose as grassroots attempts to assert control over the political process. Prohibiting them bodes ill for representative institutions in our community, potentially opening the door to official corruption, increased ideological polarization and the perpetuation of an oligarchy out of synch with public opinion.

The only bright spot in this sorry tale may be the existence of a free press that informs citizens about assaults on their democracy.

—Sandy Hinchman


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.