Failing the smell test...
Apr 26, 2018 | 825 views | 0 0 comments | 55 55 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Curtis Wells has mastered the art of changing the subject.

The letters to which he responded in last week’s “My View” column had raised three questions: why he, as the Grand County Council’s liaison with the Utah Association of Counties, failed to inform his colleagues about pending legislation (House Bill 244) seeking to invalidate the form of government chosen by substantial majorities in three separate election cycles; whether he was in any way complicit in framing the bill or moving it through the legislature; and whether he tipped off Lynn Jackson and other allies in the Republican Party in order to pull a fast one on the voting public.

If such allegations prove true, they constitute a serious ethical lapse. But, rather than addressing these issues, Mr. Wells tried to deflect attention from them by calling his detractors “vitriol-spewing liberals” who are “obsessed with control” and angry that they didn’t “get their way.”

I submit that Mr. Wells misrepresents the concerns of his critics. Those who protested the recent coup d’état by Republican Party operatives can live with losing fairly and squarely at the polls.

Democracy requires that citizens be mature enough to take their lumps. It is incompatible, however, with sneaky backroom maneuvering by a self-appointed elite attempting to change the rules in the middle of the game. Had his ideological opponents circumvented democratic norms and procedures in the way Mr. Wells and his associates apparently did, their voices would be the loudest ones crying foul — and rightly so.

If our county government is really as dysfunctional, incompetent and irresponsible as they would have us believe, they need to make a detailed case for that proposition to the general public. To opt for the underhanded strategy of enlisting the state legislature to force personal preferences on the rest of us suggests that Mr. Wells himself is the true control freak, determined to “get his way” by fair means or foul.

I agree with his admonition that people should be civil and respectful in political debates. But the deeds of his faction fail the smell test, and it is neither uncivil nor disrespectful to say so.

—Sandy Hinchman


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.