Thoughts on truck bypass
Jun 21, 2018 | 640 views | 0 0 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print

According to the Utah Department of Transportation (The Times-Independent, June 7), semi-trucks constitute 30 percent of traffic through Moab on Hwy. 191, and 30 percent is through traffic. That’s 60 percent and increasing every day. This makes negotiating through town difficult for both locals and tourists.

A possible bypass could be along the west side of town paralleling Hwy. 191 south. With limited land in the Moab Valley, should we use it for a bypass? It is valued at only $100,000 per acre now, but going up fast. Two-hundred feet of highway only takes an acre, but it would be worth it to have the big beautiful trucks echo off the cliffs, lulling us to sleep all night.

Don’t build another uranium tailings situation that will be obsolete in a few years. Hwy. 191 will be even busier in a few more years. Allowing a truck route anywhere through Moab will be a disaster, like the tailings pile, and hated by all of the present Moabites and the many hundreds of the new San Juan residents expected soon south of Moab. I am sure that the semi- trucks pulling the grade will keep us all awake at night. Their echoes off the cliffs south of Moab can already be heard and it will only get worse.

Permanent solution: The other way for a bypass could save the limited land in the valley. I hope you won’t miss the diesel smoke and the trucks serenading you. Either way it will take another bridge, but this way would be a permanent fix. Take the trucks and cars that don’t want to stop in Moab off Hwy. 191 onto the Potash Road, cross a bridge over the Colorado River at Kane Creek and continue along a new highway that will generally follow Kane Creek four or five miles to Trough Springs Canyon, leading to County Road 132, Hatch Point Road (Anticline Overlook Road) on top of the mesa. There are several washes that you can access to get on top of the flat mesa. I have walked through several of these.

The first large wash, Trough Springs Canyon, is my recommendation for this bypass. The new road will connect to County Road 133, the Needles Overlook Road. This is part of the Canyon Rims Recreation Area, about two thousand feet above the Colorado River. There are lots of fantastic view points for tourists to stop at that are within a short drive from this road: The Colorado River, Hurrah Pass, the Potash Mine, Canyonlands viewpoint, the Needles viewpoint, also a large BLM campground with restroom facilities, and where the high elevation usually provides cool breezes. Trucks could whistle on down the bypass to join Hwy. 191, a short distance from Monticello. The whole scenic trip would be cherished by tourists and semi-truck drivers as well.

–Lin Ottinger


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.