Pandora’s box has been opened
Jun 28, 2018 | 679 views | 0 0 comments | 32 32 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Editor,

Regarding the recent articles in the paper about the activities of the Travel Council, they seem surprised about the negative comments and complaints about the ever-increasing impacts of tourism. The Travel Council wants to show people the benefits of tourism. Granted, it does have its very large economic benefits, but how do increasing amounts of traffic and congestion, long lines, higher costs, and more crime benefit the locals?

How does one explain the benefits of a tourist economy to someone who has to work two jobs to barely get by but still cannot even find a place to live? And is dealing with increased noise, illegal camping and overnight rentals a benefit to our neighborhoods?

Advertising to bring in ever more tourists when we can barely handle all the current issues seems irresponsible, and is a hard sell when people are frustrated, angry and fed up with what is happening. And then there is the fear – about what is happening, about losing our way of life, losing what makes Moab special, and fear about the damage being done to the very thing that so many come here to experience – our beautiful, but fragile, environment.

I don’t know how the Travel Council comes up with their decisions, such as making Moab a year-round destination, or deciding to do massive advertising, not only in Denver, but now the LA basin. But it is easy to feel like local voices are not being listened to in these most important decisions that will affect the future of everyone here.

Increased transparency and regular, direct communication with locals could go a long way to helping us understand just what it is you do, and why. Why not schedule regular “town hall” meetings to answer questions, update information and explain what you are doing. It is crucial to actively seek input from locals on how to responsibly grow our economy while managing tourism issues, rather than have it seem like the Travel Council is making these decisions on their own.

What about taking a “whole town, across-the-board” survey, like UDOT is doing for downtown, to guide future decisions based on what the people who live here want to see.

I’d also like to know who the Travel Council answers to--is it under the supervision of a higher local entity? Is there accountability to the Moab City and Grand County councils, or is everything done according to mandates from Salt Lake City?

And what about the idea posited that we use Travel Council funds to educate tourists and mitigate all the impacts? That seems like a great idea.

Pandora’s box has been opened--so we need creative, responsible, educated and wise decisions to be made, together, for our future.

–Patrice Mott

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.