Rift grows over plan for San Rafael Swell
by Rose Egelhoff
The Times-Independent
Jun 28, 2018 | 1255 views | 0 0 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The San Rafael Reef, seen from Interstate 70. Congress is considering changes to how the area is managed. Utah Rep. John Curtis has introduced legislation.	 Courtesy photo
The San Rafael Reef, seen from Interstate 70. Congress is considering changes to how the area is managed. Utah Rep. John Curtis has introduced legislation. Courtesy photo

Congress is considering a bill that would change the management of the San Rafael Swell.

At a June 21 hearing of the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Federal Lands, John Curtis, who represents Utah’s third congressional district, testified on behalf of the bill, which he introduced. While Emery County officials and recreation groups hail the bill as a balanced, bi-partisan approach to public lands, some conservation groups are concerned that the details of the bill undermine its conservation purpose.

In his testimony before the committee, Curtis said the bill establishes 380,000 acres of conservation area and 575,000 acres of wilderness for a total of nearly a million acres of permanent conservation.

“We targeted the areas that are most broadly supported for the highest level of wilderness protection and we utilized the conservation area to highlight the unique history and multiple historic uses of the area. Next, we gave Utah state parks the ability to manage the area around Goblin Valley State Park that is most in need of upkeep. We also created the Temple Mountain Cooperative Management Area to better manage the outdoor recreation opportunities that are in the area. We also authorized the removal of state land trust parcels out of the conservation areas to be moved to other parts of the state that generate revenue for the benefit of Utah state school children. On top of all of this, we created the 2,500-acre Jurassic National Monument and designate 54 miles of wild and scenic river. It’s hard to look at this bill and not see it as a win for all stakeholders involved,” Curtis said.

The bill has garnered support from the Access Fund, Emery County Historic Preservation Commission, American Whitewater and the Outdoor Industry Association.

However, conservation groups including the Utah Sierra Club and the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance are concerned about “cherry-stemming,” the practice of exempting roads from wilderness or conservation area designations, resulting in long, thin strips of unprotected land. Both groups are also concerned that the bill does not go far enough, leaving out some areas that the Bureau of Land Management manages for wilderness characteristics. In a press release, SUWA said that Labyrinth Canyon and Desolation Canyon both merit protections that the bill does not provide.

“Large swaths of land have been excluded from this act,” Ashely Soltysiak, the Utah Sierra Club director, told The Times-Independent. “... We don’t think that it’s been adequately protective of archeological resources or areas with wilderness characteristics. Then there are roads that have been legislated through this act that are … have not been ground-truthed... That really pose issues for habitat fragmentation within this wilderness area. We are very concerned about the bill in its current form.”

The next stop for the bill is a vote in the House of Representatives.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.