Constituents want better protection
Jul 05, 2018 | 597 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

As someone who has worn down some shoes walking miles through the San Rafael Swell, I am deeply frustrated by the content of and process for the Emery County Public Lands Management Act. At a hearing last week, Representative Curtis described the bill as bringing together stakeholders and “a win for everybody.” Why then does no environmental group based in Utah support the bill?

It is because people who know the land realize the bill designates no new wilderness beyond that already protected as wilderness study areas or natural areas, leaving two-thirds of deserving wild lands undesignated.

It is because the bill ensures that almost a thousand miles of motorized routes through a purported “National Conservation Area” will remain open in perpetuity despite a court settlement requiring the routes be re-assessed for unacceptable impacts to cultural artifacts, natural quiet and other values.

Senator Hatch and Representative Curtis seem to think it’s enough to listen to the Emery County Commissioners who drafted the bill. At a hearing last week, the only witness allowed was an Emery County spokesman.

They need to remember they have other constituents who want better protection for the irreplaceable wild lands of the San Rafael Swell.

–Thomas J. Messenger


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.