An open process? Really?
Jul 05, 2018 | 886 views | 0 0 comments | 39 39 recommendations | email to a friend | print

I’ve heard Rep. John Curtis praise his Emery County Public Lands Management Act as a win for all stakeholders. Normally, these stakeholders would include landowners, conservation groups, local governments, off-road enthusiasts, water-users, and others who care about the lands we own in common. On June 21, a hearing was held in Washington, D.C. on the Emery County bill, but the single stakeholder allowed to testify was an Emery County spokesman. Only Emery County. There are over 3 million Utahns and 325.7 million Americans, including many people like me who know the Swell firsthand and object to this bill as written. An open process fair to all? Really?

Representative Curtis’ bill only protects a bare minimum of wilderness, limiting wilderness designation to areas that are ALREADY under protection (wilderness study areas and natural areas). This is no more than a name change. And by “cherry-stemming” a thousand miles of vehicle routes, the bill fails to adequately protect even the lands it claims it is protecting.

This bill is a blatant gift to the commissioners of Emery County and a loss to anyone who wants to see the San Rafael remain the unspoiled place it is today. The land and the public deserve a better process and better bill.

–John Gould


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.