Tourism and water ...
Jul 26, 2018 | 607 views | 0 0 comments | 39 39 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Editor,

I love our community. When Frank DeAngelis was here, to talk about the Columbine shootings and their aftermath, he remarked that Moab is the finest community that he has ever seen! What we have here is priceless!

Although I’m writing about two non-partisan issues that I know that we can make some really helpful inroads on, I’m quite obviously concerned. And I am far from alone about this. Sure, some people have already started on some bright ideas regarding these issues (like affordable housing solutions). But let’s continue to put our heads together and make them happen. 

The first issue I am concerned about is our tourism economy. I think that it can work just fine. However, as it is, it is not sustainable. (There have been times when I’ve wondered if our tourism economy is a ‘runaway truck’, hurtling out of control. However, I truly do believe that we can still shape this growth. It will take a concerted effort, though.) There is no lack of really good thinkers in our town. So let’s do some good thinking and set things up that work for us in the long run. (For example: a community that our children would want, and can afford, to raise their children in.) 

When I participated in the Downtown Plan workshop, I was definitely taken aback by something. This something was that we residents and our community seemed to be something of an afterthought in the planning process.  Now is the time for your voices to be heard.

There has been plenty written on how National Park gateway (and other tourism-based) communities have solved similar issues. Judy Powers, in her guest editorial this past spring, mentioned Asheville, NC. That is definitely a good place to start but there are other ones, too. We don’t need to reinvent the wheel at all. 

Perhaps we can start by writing down the qualities that we want to maintain here. (Qualities like: a safe community for ourselves, our children, and our elders; a healthy ecosystem, which includes at base clean water and clean air; or whatever is important to you.) This will give us each a handy gauge from which we can base every action that we take.

Water, that brings me to the second issue. When Powell led his expedition out into these western lands, he warned the young Anglo nation that, west of the Mississippi, there was more land than water. This is especially true in our high desert region.

The USGS study has already told us that we have less water than we think. Hopefully now as their final results are available, and water rights are reassessed, we will be able to do some careful budgeting of our water resource. (And no longer continue to develop like there’s no end to this resource.)

As it sits, I have to wonder if we haven’t just set ourselves up for another boom-and-bust cycle. Let’s set things in motion in a way that’ll work for years to come. Our community is a treasure. Please let’s not eclipse this precious asset with our immediate needs, as distracting as they can be sometimes.

–MB Tatsy Guild

Moab

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.