Senator Lee opposes parks act
Oct 04, 2018 | 741 views | 0 0 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Utah’s Sen. Mike Lee opposes a new bipartisan bill that would divert royalty money from drilling and mining on public land to help pay for the more than $11 billion backlog of maintenance needs at national parks throughout the country.

Lee sits on the Senate Energy Committee, which is discussing the bill this week. He doesn’t support the Restore Our Parks Act because it takes about $6.5 billion from the general U.S. treasury without offsetting the new spending with cuts, he said. Lee’s spokesman on Monday, Oct. 1 said, “Senator Lee does not support the Restore Our Parks Act because it is not paid for.”

Currently, a portion of royalties from mineral extraction — coal, natural gas, etc. — flows directly to the U.S. treasury. The proposed act, which is sponsored by Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and supported by his three Utah House colleagues, all Republicans, would steer $6.5 billion over five years to national parks to help rebuild bridges, pave roads and upgrade trails, sewer systems and buildings.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, isn’t sure whether he will support the bill but backs the concept.

“While Senator Hatch shares concerns about the cost, he welcomes continued dialogue about long-term investment in national park infrastructure in Utah and around the country,” Hatch spokesman Matt Whitlock told the Salt Lake Tribune. “He looks forward to working with his colleagues to find responsible ways to pay for this critical investment as the bill continues forward.”

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke visited just one of Utah’s national parks last week—Zion–to garner support for the act. He toured an aging campground and highlighting maintenance problems there.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.