My View
by Curtis M. Jensen
Judicial Performance Evaluation Commissioner
Oct 04, 2018 | 575 views | 0 0 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The nation’s attention has recently been captured by the confirmation process of potentially the next justice to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States. From private letters to public demonstrations, thousands of people have voiced their opinions on whether Brett Kavanaugh should sit on our nation’s highest court. Justice and judges provide engaging dinner-table discussions—their decisions are often T.V. headlines and front-page news articles. Every day our lives are impacted by judges and the decisions they make. Judges settle conflicts between family members, our neighbors and our own personal businesses, as well as those we patronize. Judges issue sentences for crimes committed in our communities. Judges play a critical role in maintaining law and order within our communities and our lives.

As voters we can play a vital role in ensuring our judiciary maintains a high standard and is comprised only of quality judges. Voters have the right to participate in retention elections. Retention elections provide voters a meaningful voice in deciding who serves in the judiciary. Unlike many other states, Utah does not hold contested elections for its judges. Utah judges are appointed based on merit, outside the grasp of political influence, and are free to rule on issues without being tethered to a political position. In place of contested elections, our state conducts judicial retention elections, providing citizens with an important role in determining whether a judge should remain on the bench for another term. In these retention elections, voters cast a simple yes or no vote, electing to either retain or dismiss a judge. Each voter’s task is to become knowledgeable enough to evaluate the performance of sitting judges to cast a fair and informed vote.

Information about a judge up for retention can be found online at, where you simply type in your address, pull up your sample ballot, and see all the judges on your ballot up for retention. Click on the link to find information about a specific judge or select the “Judicial Evaluation” link to see all judge evaluations.

The information at is reliable and fair. In 2008, the Utah Legislature created the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) as an independent government body and charged it to create performance evaluations for all Utah judges. JPEC is made up of 13 commissioners who are appointed by the three branches of government. The commissioners are lawyers and non-lawyers alike. No more than two members from each appointing authority may be from the same political party, helping to ensure partisan balance. JPEC’s performance evaluations are an important tool through which voters can become educated on a judge’s performance.

The JPEC commissioners serve Utah citizens by gathering and analyzing judicial performance data. JPEC makes a recommendation on whether to retain a judge based on minimum performance standards established by law. If a judge passes those minimum standards, the law presumes commissioners will vote to recommend the judge be retained. If a judge fails to pass a minimum performance standard, the law presumes commissioners will vote to recommend the judge not be retained.

JPEC performs an important role in judicial accountability. But that role is successful only when voters also play their part and use the information JPEC provides to cast informed votes in November. Before entering the voting booth, take some time to visit There, you will find all the information you need to vote confidently in this year’s judicial retention election. By doing so, you can help to ensure that we have quality judges serving Utah.

Curtis M. Jensen is a JPEC commissioner, a founding partner of Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C., and a former president of the Utah State Bar.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.