HB 224 won’t lead to the ‘good old’ days’
Nov 15, 2018 | 736 views | 0 0 comments | 72 72 recommendations | email to a friend | print

In trying to follow the evolving interpretation of HB 224 and its implications for Grand County, Moab City, and Castle Valley, I accumulated a big stack of clippings and printouts. The Utah Legislature passed HB 224 (89-pages!) on the last day of this year’s session.

The legislature certainly found reason to review and update the election statutes in this election year. And it was appropriate for the Utah Association of Counties (UAC) to participate in the revision process.

However, as far as I can tell, it was not the new statute that caused such consternation locally; it was instead the removal of the clause grandfathering in existing forms of county governments – a removal which was apparently done by demand of UAC and/or Grand County Council Vice Chair Curtis Wells.

If grandfathering had not been removed from the statute, it wouldn’t matter whose petition, signatures, or resolution was filed first in time. Nor would we be faced with a battle over an appointment council to select a study committee to recommend a new form of government for an up-or-down, take-it-or-leave-it vote by the good people of Grand County.

Perhaps the aggressive advocates of a return to partisan politics expect a return to the good old’ days of 1944 (as depicted on page B6 of the Nov. 8 T-I) when Grand County voted a straight Republican ticket despite a national and statewide Democratic sweep, even picking Thomas Dewey over FDR for president.

Things have changed in the three quarters of a century since 1944, and it seems that Grand County may now prefer nonpartisan governance.

–Jean Binyon


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.