Tuesday, July 14, 2020

SUBSCRIPTIONS

Moab, UT

79.8 F
Moab
More

    Travel Council reality check

    Featured Stories

    Tales of Trails: Savor spectacular views from thrilling Shafer Trail

    In the 1890s, Moab pioneer brothers Frank M. And John S. Shafer developed the route from what had been a Native American pathway connecting what is now Canyonlands National Park to the river below.

    At 99, Moab man is knighted by France

    “The French people will never forget his courage and devotion to the great cause of freedom,”

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 4: ‘A year in the land of eternal spring’

    Though I planned to return someday, whether as a Peace Corps volunteer or not, this experience proved that even the best-laid plans go awry.

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 3: Sudden departure came with painful goodbyes

    Men donned wooden masks and numerous layers of sweatshirts and ponchos then proceeded to hit each other with whips as they danced around the town square.

    Leaving Guatemala Part 2: There wasn’t enough time to say goodbye

    To say I woke up on the Monday morning of the evacuation...

    Editor,

    The Grand County Travel Council Advisory Board plans to spend $500,000 on an advertising campaign to promote Moab to the 30 million residents of southern California. That news is hard to swallow.

    It seems we’ve entered into a never-ending loop. The Travel Council continues to increase the amount of money spent on advertising and promoting Moab, which subsequently increases the number of tourists that come to Moab and stay in hotels and other nightly rental accommodations (the rental of which includes a 4.25 percent Transient Room Tax). This, in turn, increases the total amount of TRT revenue that goes to the Travel Council for even more advertising to bring more tourists to Moab, which leads to more hotels and nightly rentals being built, which drives up the price of real estate making it increasingly difficult if not impossible for local residents and workers to live here, and so on and on and on. It’s a nightmarish loop. And it’s taking a toll on the region’s residents’ quality of life.

    Do we really need MORE advertising for MORE tourists? Travel Council’s Director Elaine Gizler has stated that the TRT revenues from tourists “are paying a lot of our [Grand County’s] bills.” But many of these bills would not exist or would be minimal were it not for the nearly two million tourists visiting Moab annually.

    So, what can we do about the seemingly limitless advertising and selling of Moab? We should remind our elected county council members that the appointed Travel Council Advisory Board is merely advisory to the county council. According to the Travel Council’s bylaws, it is charged with providing “recommendations concerning the promotion and creation of recreation, tourism and conventions . . . for consideration by the Grand County Council . . . [and shall] attempt to reflect the interests of the county as a whole. (emphasis added)”

    Let’s change the amount and type of promotional advertising the Travel Council is engaged in. Attend a county council meeting and let council members know your concerns. They’re the deciders.

    –John Rzeczycki

    Moab,

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    County: Mask mandate is official

    Southeast Utah Health Department Director Bradon Bradford modeled the local order after those in Salt Lake and Summit counties.

    Lionsback Resort project begins on Sand Flats Road

    The City of Moab will have oversight of the project, which was not something that was always on the table because state law allows SITLA to develop projects without input from local authorities.

    Drought conditions grip Utah; stats are grim

    It’s unlikely things will improve this late in the water year.

    State provides 75,000 more facemasks for Moab businesses, visitors

    Local businesses may pick up free face coverings at the Canyonlands Copy Center, 375 S. Main St., in Moab.

    County approves letter opposing September gas lease sales

    The oppositional letter asserts that the lease sale “threatens the core of our tourism economy by locking in long-term oil and gas leases on and around popular recreation areas that are vital to our local economy.”