Wednesday, July 15, 2020


Moab, UT

82 F

    Arches economic study delayed ’til fall
    Reservation system impacts remain unknown

    Featured Stories

    Tales of Trails: Savor spectacular views from thrilling Shafer Trail

    In the 1890s, Moab pioneer brothers Frank M. And John S. Shafer developed the route from what had been a Native American pathway connecting what is now Canyonlands National Park to the river below.

    At 99, Moab man is knighted by France

    “The French people will never forget his courage and devotion to the great cause of freedom,”

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 4: ‘A year in the land of eternal spring’

    Though I planned to return someday, whether as a Peace Corps volunteer or not, this experience proved that even the best-laid plans go awry.

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 3: Sudden departure came with painful goodbyes

    Men donned wooden masks and numerous layers of sweatshirts and ponchos then proceeded to hit each other with whips as they danced around the town square.

    Leaving Guatemala Part 2: There wasn’t enough time to say goodbye

    To say I woke up on the Monday morning of the evacuation...

    The National Park Service’s anticipated economic analysis of its proposed reservation system was not completed in June as first planned, according to Amy Tendick, planning officer for the NPS. The agency is continuing the planning process for its “Traffic Congestion Management Plan,” an attempt to alleviate crowding in Arches National Park, and expects to have a final decision this fall.

    Meanwhile, Moab businessman Michael Liss, chair of the Moab Transit Authority Study Committee, has proposed a number of options short of the reservation system, and has told the NPS that his organization continues “to work on a shuttle and bicycle-based transportation solution” for Arches that could be implemented between Grand County and the NPS. The next meeting of the transit authority is Friday, July 27 at 3 p.m. in the conference room of Moab City Hall.

    According to a July 11 press release from NPS, more than 400 comments were received in response to the draft plan, and the agency has been reviewing the comments and revising the plan.

    “We received quite a bit of feedback on the proposal,” said Kate Cannon, superintendent of the Southeast Utah Group. “It takes time to consider each of the comments and determine how we can revise the plan to mitigate some of the concerns while finding space in the plan to include some of the good suggestions.”

    Tendick told Liss in an email that the economic analysis wasn’t finished in June because “our contractor requested additional time to incorporate more data. We will be revising the environmental analysis and responding to public comments based on the analysis and conclusions presented in the final economic study,” said Tendick. “We will release the final economic study to the public along with our revised environmental assessment in the next couple of months, when all are complete.”

    Liss, who among others had been anxiously awaiting the NPS economic study in June, posed a number of questions in light of the new delay. “Did the Arches NPS not like the conclusions of the Economic Study?” he asked The Times-Independent. “Did the economic study conclude that the EA would have a significant impact on the local economy? How did the Arches NPS suddenly find ‘new economic data’ to change their economic study?” Tendick’s response was that the NPS contractor that is compiling the information wanted more time to incorporate more data.

    Tendick did not elaborate any further, but confirmed that the final environmental assessment will be revised “based on the final economic study.” She added, “Once the park incorporates revisions to the plan, it will be submitted for agency approval before being made available to the public this fall. The NPS will “release our final plan and the economic study to the public,” at that date-uncertain time this autumn.

    Any proposed changes to traffic management will not affect visitors in the park until summer of 2019, at the earliest, Cannon pointed out. She also said the NPS does not comment on any specific revisions to the proposed plan until the review is finished. “We want to get the plan right and you can be sure we are working on it,” said Cannon.

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    County: Mask mandate is official

    Southeast Utah Health Department Director Bradon Bradford modeled the local order after those in Salt Lake and Summit counties.

    Lionsback Resort project begins on Sand Flats Road

    The City of Moab will have oversight of the project, which was not something that was always on the table because state law allows SITLA to develop projects without input from local authorities.

    Drought conditions grip Utah; stats are grim

    It’s unlikely things will improve this late in the water year.

    State provides 75,000 more facemasks for Moab businesses, visitors

    Local businesses may pick up free face coverings at the Canyonlands Copy Center, 375 S. Main St., in Moab.

    County approves letter opposing September gas lease sales

    The oppositional letter asserts that the lease sale “threatens the core of our tourism economy by locking in long-term oil and gas leases on and around popular recreation areas that are vital to our local economy.”